OhioLINK is deep in the process of migrating content from our old Bulldog/Documentum-based system to, well, something else, and we’ve been talking about the treatment of the metadata in the course of the migration. I think it is safe to say that the Bulldog asset management system (and Documentum, which bought and integrated Bulldog into its product line about five years ago) is not really known for its rich handling of metadata. Or at least how the library community thinks of metadata: Dublin Core, MIX, MODS, MARC, VRA Core, PREMIS, FGCD, etc. — all at the same time in the same application engine with structured crosswalks between them. I think it is also safe to say that pure, unqualified Dublin Core, the only datastream that is required for every FEDORA object, does not completely encompass the descriptive fidelity needed for our objects. These observations, combined with reading a mid-term project report from the RepoMMan effort in the U.K., got me thinking about metadata and how we should store it in FEDORA objects. The outcome of that line of thinking is this proposal: “to establish a practice of creating an in-line XML datastream with the label ‘DESCRIPTION’ that contains the primary descriptive metadata for each object.”
This is a preview of
Best Practice Proposal for a DESCRIPTION Datastream
.
Read the full post (752 words, estimated 3:00 mins reading time)
Also tagged DRC, Dublin Core, Fedora, libraries
Getting a Hyperlink of the Last Sent Message from Mail.app using Applescript:
Discussions of Textbooks Hit the Mainstream Media:
Managing a Gentoo Linux Server Configuration with Subversion, GLCU, and Trac:
Links to OPAC Enhancements, Wrappers, and Replacements: