Jester's Cap

Disruptive Library Technology Jester

We're Disrupted, We're Librarians, and We're Not Going to Take It Anymore

Main menu

Skip to primary content
Skip to secondary content
  • About the Blog
  • About the Author
  • About the Tagline
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact

Post navigation

← Previous Next →

Amazon Catalog Updates

Posted on May 12, 2010 by Peter Murray
This entry was posted in Blue Sky and tagged Amazon, crowdsourcing, metadata, Open Library by Peter Murray. Bookmark the permalink.

Did you know that Amazon offers a facility to make corrections to its catalog? Somewhere in the past few months someone mentioned this to me and I tried it out. (Unfortunately, it has been long enough now that I’ve forgotten who told me; if you are the one, please fess up in this post’s comments section. It was Ron Murray from the Library of Congress. Thanks, Ron!) And it works! Is this a model for crowdsourced corrections to library data?

Here is how it looks from a user’s perspective.

Step 1. Finding something to correct


Amazon has a pretty good catalog, so for the purposes of demonstrating this feature it took a while to find a record to correct. I used the suggestions from Typo of the Day for Librarians for ideas of errors to look for in the Amazon catalog. One of the suggested typos was Sucess*, etc. (for Success , etc.), and I found a record for How to Talk to Anyone: 62 Little Tricks for Big Success in Relationships in audio CD format with this misspelling. As this image shows, the original title was “How to Talk to Anyone: 62 Little Tricks for Big Sucess in Relationships”

Amazon page for 'How to Talk to Anyone' with typo

Step 2. Making the Correction


In the “Product Details” section of the Amazon catalog page is a link to “update product info”

Excerpt of Amazon product information page with the 'update product info' link highlighted


Following that link takes you to a form that is prefilled with all of the information from the Amazon catalog. You can make your corrections here and provide citation URLs to reference the source of the correct information. (In the excerpt of the form on this page only the Title and Reference sections are show. Click through the image to see the full version of the form.)

Excerpt of Amazon Catalog Update Form


You are given a chance to preview your changes before submitting them. Note in this case that the reference URL I’m using is actually a link to the cover image for this item at Amazon. A bit of neat symmetry there, I figure.

Preview of Amazon Catalog Updates


After submitting the changes, you get a nice “thank you” from Amazon for making their service better.

Submission confirmation page from Amazon Catalog Update service

Step 3. Getting Confirmation from Amazon


After a bit — mere hours in my case — Amazon will send you a confirmation back that the correction has been accepted.

From: “gfix-noreply@amazon.com”
To: “peter@OhioLINK.edu”Subject: Your Amazon.com Catalog Update Request

==== This is an automated response message - please do not reply ====

Thank you for using the Catalog Update Form to send suggestions for

How to Talk to Anyone: 62 Little Tricks for Big Sucess in Relationships (ASIN 1593160267)

Your update has been accepted and processed. It will appear online within the next two to three business days.
Attribute: Title
Current value:
How to Talk to Anyone: 62 Little Tricks for Big Sucess in Relationships

Your suggestion:
How to Talk to Anyone: 62 Little Tricks for Big Success in Relationships

Data accuracy is highly important to us. We appreciate the time you have taken to submit your updates to us.

Best regards,

Catalog Department
www.amazon.com

And if you go to this product page now you’ll see the title has been corrected.

Would this Work for Libraries?


Now Amazon must have some resources backing up this service to do the verification of submissions. And it makes sense for them because corrected metadata makes it easier for their products to be found and purchased. If libraries were to consider providing an equivalent service for our metadata, could we justify the costs? Is this a good use of our time and effort?

If we were to do it, I think it might have to be done by a bibliographic utility like OCLC who has ways to push the updated records to member libraries. Otherwise we run the risk of diluting the corrections across many individual library catalogs. Interestingly, this sort of user-generated correction facility one that the Open Library already provides. (Open Library is a wiki-like service that offers the ability for anyone to make changes to its records, much like how anyone can edit articles on Wikipedia.) So between Amazon and Open Library there is a continuum of workflows of mediated corrections to unmediated corrections for us to consider. This scheme, of course, begs us to consider the notion of distributed version control systems for handling our bibliographic data so that changes can be merged across many sources.

Lots to think about…

Link to this post!

Share this:

(This post was updated on 14-May-2010.)

Links in "Amazon Catalog Updates"

Tags for "Amazon Catalog Updates"

Find Related Content: within DLTJ Technorati del.icio.us Wikipedia
Amazon Find posts tagged 'Amazon' in DLTJ Find posts tagged 'Amazon' in Technorati Find posts tagged 'Amazon' in del.icio.us Find posts tagged 'Amazon' in Wikipedia (English)
crowdsourcing Find posts tagged 'crowdsourcing' in DLTJ Find posts tagged 'crowdsourcing' in Technorati Find posts tagged 'crowdsourcing' in del.icio.us Find posts tagged 'crowdsourcing' in Wikipedia (English)
metadata Find posts tagged 'metadata' in DLTJ Find posts tagged 'metadata' in Technorati Find posts tagged 'metadata' in del.icio.us Find posts tagged 'metadata' in Wikipedia (English)
Open Library Find posts tagged 'Open Library' in DLTJ Find posts tagged 'Open Library' in Technorati Find posts tagged 'Open Library' in del.icio.us Find posts tagged 'Open Library' in Wikipedia (English)

Related Posts on Disruptive Library Technology Jester

  • Solr-ized MARC Record Catalog
  • Out of Print Books Get New Life via Amazon and Participating Libraries
  • Long-term Preservation Storage: OCLC Digital Archive versus Amazon S3

Track and Share With Others

• Technorati iconTechnorati Cosmos

• TrackBack URI


Logging In...

Profile cancel

Sign in with Twitter Sign in with Facebook
or

Not published

  • 21 Replies
  • 20 Comments
  • 0 Tweets
  • 0 Facebook
  • 1 Pingback
Last reply was March 9, 2012
  1. JW
    View May 12, 2010

    I’ve never been entirely clear on how Amazon resolves cataloging conflicts, such as when two books have the same ISBN. One person says the title is X and another says it is Y and then a third says it is X. You get it. I can’t recall Amazon ever rejecting a change I suggested (out of a few dozen). In my experience as a bookseller, the system works well overall.

    Amazon also let’s sellers create new records. This too works well overall, but contributes to the occurrence of many slightly different entries for the same edition, especially for pre-ISBN books.

    Reply
  2. Jonathan Rochkind
    View May 13, 2010

    Very interesting! I think something like this is DEFINITELY what libraries should be trying to do. But our broken ‘cooperative cataloging’ workflow where none of us end up sharing local changes with each other would limit it’s utility until we do that. Just my libraries users, not critical mass. Worldcat, yes critical mass.

    Meanwhile on the Amazon front — does this feature let you correct broken ISBNs too? There are occasionally wrong ISBNs in Amazon, which end up causing Umlaut to fetch wrong data when using amazon api calls. It would be sweet if I could fix em myself when encountered.

    Reply
  3. Suzuki Takao
    View May 13, 2010

    Amazon Catalog Updates | Disruptive Library Technology Jester http://bit.ly/bLaaqJ

    Reply
  4. Peter Murray
    View May 14, 2010

    JW: Its not clear to me how Amazon resolves conflicts either, and unfortunately I don’t have any inside sources at Amazon to query. I got a sense of how Google (and Internet Library and OCLC) deal with the same problem at an ALA forum in January. Google does it with a statistical inference method based on a large number of sources of records. That technique probably doesn’t work for Amazon’s catalog, so I suspect there is an army of cataloger-types that resolve conflicts from the product information feeds from its sources as well as these one-off reports by individuals through the process described in this post. Thanks for reporting your experiences!

    Jonathan: A good question about correcting ISBNs. The metadata correction form does not include a field for suggesting a corrected ISBN (see the full version of the form as an image). Since that is used as an identifier, I can imagine it wrecks a bit more havoc with their systems if it gets changed. Toss into that the fact that ISBNs are representing different manifestations (the hardcover version gets one, the softcover one gets another, the Kindle version gets yet a third, and the iBookstore one gets a different one, too) that trying to reconcile all of this might be more than Amazon wants to take on. Of course, it is of great interest to us in the library community.

    These are great questions, and I’ll try to find some answers. If anyone else has insights, please share them here.

    Reply
  5. Ron Murray
    View May 14, 2010

    I agree that “someone” like OCLC could (to its benefit to be sure) host a “resource description correction and enhancement” service, and support community coordination of the correction & enhancement process. Things to consider:

    * Surveillance – Who is out there discovering erroneous information? What types of mistakes are to be attended to?

    * Reportage – Form based reportage à la Amazon is the way to go.

    * Review – The same population doing the surveillance – or some subset of stalwarts – can perform review and verification tasks. Review the reviewer reviewing the reviewer…

    * Correction – Up to the utilities, but certainly some kind of notification system keyed to unique (enough) IDs would be involved.

    * Costs, rights to community provided information – I punt…

    * Etc.

    How to get started on this? Talk it up on the Jester!

    Reply
  6. Jonathan Rochkind
    View May 14, 2010

    Peter, yeah, not surprising that Amazon doesn’t let you correct ISBNs without intermediation.

    However, when I’ve found a bad ISBN in the past, and reported it to Amazon simply using the feedback form, the ISBNs do seem to get corrected in a fairly timely manner.

    Reply
  7. Garrett Eastman
    View May 15, 2010

    " *

    Amazon Catalog Updates" #corrections #bibliographicdata #libraries: http://bit.ly/bJiJqr

    Reply
  8. Cammie
    View May 15, 2010

    "Did you know that Amazon offers a facility to make corrections to its catalog?" via Dltj http://bit.ly/aSnbBD

    Reply
  9. Cabot Library
    View May 17, 2010

    "Amazon Catalog Updates" #corrections #bibliographicdata #libraries: http://bit.ly/bJiJqr (shows how readers can correct data in Amazon)

    Reply
  10. Jean Small
    View May 18, 2010

    does anyone know how you get a z39.50 connection to amazon’s catalog?

    Reply
    • Peter Murrayreplied:
      View May 18, 2010

      To the best of my knowledge, Amazon doesn’t speak z39.50. [Insert commentary here about the isolating nature of library-specific standards.] They do have a machine interface that they call the Product Advertising API which they expect you to use — as the name would suggest — as a way to drive customers to items in the Amazon catalog. That is probably the closest they come to what we in the library community would think of as a catalog connection.

      Reply
  11. Jonathan Rochkind
    View May 18, 2010

    Jean: You can not.

    Reply
  12. Peter Murray
    View May 18, 2010

    By the way — I’m still trying to make contact with the appropriate people at Amazon to see if I can get some insights into their metadata practices and discover what we might be able to learn from them.

    Reply
  13. Karen
    View May 18, 2010

    Amazon Catalog Updates | Disruptive Library Technology Jester – http://ow.ly/1MGJo

    Reply
  14. OPLIN
    View June 4, 2010

    For serious catalogers only: http://bit.ly/czuq4a Did you know that Amazon offers a facility to make corrections to its catalog?

    Reply
  15. Alyssa Briggs
    View June 5, 2010

    RT @OPLIN: For serious catalogers only: http://bit.ly/czuq4a Did you know that Amazon offers a facility to make corrections to its catalog?

    Reply
  16. Fred Leise
    View June 8, 2010

    Interesting: Amazon lets customers suggest corrections to its product metadata. http://tinyurl.com/24u4f67

    Reply
  17. Lisa Costello
    View June 8, 2010

    Fascinating: RT @ChicagoIndexer: Interesting: Amazon lets customers suggest corrections to its product metadata. http://tinyurl.com/24u4f67

    Reply
  18. NARESH
    View August 20, 2010

    I want to know more about new technologies

    Reply
  19. openinnovation
    View March 1, 2011

    Amazon Catalog Updates | Disruptive Library Technology Jester: http://bit.ly/hh7Hcw

    Reply
  20. Crowdsourcing — Council on Library and Information Resources
    View March 9, 2012

    Kramer auto Pingback[...] j. Peter Murray Amazon catalog updates [...]

    Reply

Home

Search

Recent Posts

  • Code4Lib Journal Issue #20 Published; My Editorial: “It is Volunteers All the Way Down…”
  • Notes on the Code4Lib Virtual Lightning Talks
  • Interlibrary Loan Standards Undergoing Revision at the ISO Level
  • Vote for an ALA2013 Ignite Session on Open Source Communities
  • A Great iPad Keyboard/Case Combination: New Trent Airbender
  • ResourceSync Specification Draft Published for Comment

Archives

  • 2013: J F M A M J J A S O N D
  • 2012: J F M A M J J A S O N D
  • 2011: J F M A M J J A S O N D
  • 2010: J F M A M J J A S O N D
  • 2009: J F M A M J J A S O N D
  • 2008: J F M A M J J A S O N D
  • 2007: J F M A M J J A S O N D
  • 2006: J F M A M J J A S O N D
  • 2005: J F M A M J J A S O N D

Feeds and Such

  • Link to Podcast (RSS feed) for this blog
    Add Podcast to iTunes subscription
    Receive DLTJ by e-mail:


    Delivered by FeedBurner
  • View Peter Murray's profile on LinkedIn

Copyright

This work by Peter Murray is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States.

Creative Commons License
© 2013 | Theme based on Twenty Eleven by Wordpress.org | DLTJ strives for Standards Compliant XHTML & CSS | RSS Posts & Comments
From the Disruptive Library Technology Jester (http://dltj.org/), printed on Saturday the 25th of May 2013 at 8:02:01 PM UTC (+0000). The URL to this page is

[Creative Commons Logo] This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 543 Howard Street, 5th Floor, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA.
This work by Peter Murray is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States.