A PDF of the presentation slides is now available online.The presentation is open to the public, and will be from 10am to noon in the Mumford Room (6th floor of the LC Madison Building). The abstract of the talk is:
In response to dramatic increases in the quantity and types of culturally significant resources in libraries, cataloging theories like FRBR (Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records) have become more complex when compared to traditional cataloging theories. The need to re-conceptualize and justify bibliographic resource description theories is now critical, due to the emergence of the World Wide Web – whose structure and content is more varied and more dynamic than that of libraries. To support the argument that the “commonsense imagery” of analog materials limits our thinking about cataloging and about resource description in general, the speaker will review how for atomic physicists, the “commonsense imagery” of physical processes had to be abandoned in the early 20th Century because the mathematics that explained the measurements of physical processes could no longer be related to any perceivable object or event. The diagrams that have fueled physicist’s imagination since 1945 correspond to nothing in the physical world – but were instead generated by the theories created by the physicists. The speaker suggests that the complexity of analog and digital Cultural Heritage resources warrants a similar approach to their description. This approach – “Paper Tool” creation and use – applies equally well to bibliographic descriptions of library content as well as to the emerging Semantic Web.
I’ve been privileged to watch Ron’s work unfold over the past few months, and what he has created is a compelling abstract model for handling the interrelated nature of bibliographic data with FRBR structures. FRBR tells us that bibliographic data contains more complexity than flat MARC records can allow, and Ron’s paper tools shows us graphical evidence of that complexity. And not only the challenges that such complexity suggests, but also the benefits we gain by tackling that complexity head on. Just to give you a taste, his modeling technique describes the various works, expressions, manifestations, and items of Pippi Longstocking like this:
Pippi Longstocking in Paper Tool Modeling
Although I won’t be able to attend the presentation in person, I understand that a recording will be made available later. Even so, if you are in the Washington DC area next Monday, I strongly suggest that you attend Ron’s presentation to get the full effect of his presentation of the model and the ability to ask questions.
The presentation flyer also contains this information: Request ADA accommodations five business days in advance by contacting (202) 707-6362 or ADA@loc.gov. For more information about this program, contact Angela Kinney (anki@loc.gov) or Judith Cannan (jcan@loc.gov).
(This post was updated on 11-Jan-2010.)
![[Creative Commons Logo]](/wp-content/themes/local/cc-by-na-sa-30-us-88x31.png){kind=small}
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 543 Howard Street, 5th Floor, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA.
3 Comments
I love cross-fertlization like this, especially when new ideas are needed, like they in the area of citation analysis.
This comment was originally posted on FriendFeed
Definitely. It has a very practical aspect when trying to disambiguate citations from various sources and various media formats. That is how I’m hoping to put it to use.
This comment was originally posted on FriendFeed
Warp speed from caveman days to reality research of original historical publications in todays world of cyber space. Would have enjoyed such a tool during the era of micro-fiche.
1 Trackback
Post a Comment