Thomson Reuters is suing George Mason University to stop distribution of the newest version of Zotero, a Firefox browser plugin for managing citation data. According to a story from Courthouse News Service, Reuters is claiming that George Mason is violating the terms of its license agreement by including a function in Zotero that will convert citation styles from the proprietary EndNote format to a format that can be used by Zotero. Reuters also asking for $10 million in damages for destroying the EndNote customer base. Since George Mason is a state institution, the Commonwealth of Virginia is also named in the suit.
According to the Courthouse News article, Reuters says: “A significant and highly touted feature of the new beta version of Zotero, however, is its ability to convert – in direct violation of the License Agreement – Thomson’s 3,500 plus proprietary .ens style files within the EndNote Software into free, open source, easily distributable Zotero .csl files.” In fact, there is a closed enhancement ticket in the Zotero project management tool for an EndNote to Zotero style converter. The EndNote license agreement says
RESTRICTIONS. End User may not modify, translate, decompile, reverse engineer, retransmit in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopied, recorded or otherwise), resell or redistribute the Product, or any portion thereof, without the prior written consent of ResearchSoft. Except as expressly set forth in this Agreement, End User may not make any use of the Product.
One suspects the heart of the lawsuit claim is that the EndNote .ens style files are a portion of the EndNote product and therefore cannot be reverse engineered, which it appears the Zotero team has done.
The suit was filed on September 5th in the civil division of Richmond City Circuit Court, case number CL08004225-00. There is not yet any significant information online, but if you are interested in the lawsuit you may want to keep an eye on the Virginia Circuit Court Case Information website. (Because of the way the site is built, one cannot link directly to the case. Select “Richmond City Circuit” from the pull-down list, select “Begin”, then at the next screen select “Civil” and plug in the case number listed above.) No public word from Zotero (nothing in the project’s blog or the forums) or Thomson Reuters (on the EndNote news or the Thomson Scientific news pages) on the lawsuit.
This could be an interesting lawsuit to follow. The Zotero enhancement ticket has a discussion about the legality of using the EndNote Styles collection or EndNote styles posted on other sites. The EndNote software itself makes it possible to create and export the EndNote Style .ens files, so many EndNote Style files are the result of the work of entities other than Thomson Reuters. Presumably the person that created the ENS-to-CSL translator for Zotero did not have a copy of the EndNote software and so was not bound by the EndNote license agreement. Does the fact that the ENS files were published on open websites where they could be accessed without using EndNote itself make a difference?
Zotero is a project of the Center for History and New Media at George Mason and is sponsored/funded by the Institute for Museum and Library Services, the Mellon Foundation, and the Sloan Foundation.
Found via Mark Leggott’s and David Bigwood’s blogs.
Updates
28-Sep-2008 Richard Wallis notes:
Following that link to Endnote export styles [link] you end up on a page containing the following words: “EndNote output styles are provided solely for use by licensed owners of EndNote and with the EndNote product.”
What’s interesting is the fact that this sentence was recently (within the last 8 months) added to the site. The January 13th January 3rd snapshot of that page in the Wayback Machine doesn’t have that sentence. I wonder when it was added. In both cases (the current page and the Wayback Machine snapshot), the note at the bottom says “This page was last modified on: November 4, 2005″ — I would disagree.
Also — I just found a copy of the Thomson Reuters’ complaint [PDF] on the Courthouse News Service website.
31-Oct-2008 As Rick notes in the comments, the January 13th version on the Wayback Machine of the EndNote Styles page is no longer there. It has been replaced with a link to the January 3rd version, and you can periodically check the list of all versions of the page in available in the Wayback Machine. Odd — I didn’t think pages were supposed to go away on the Internet Archive.
(This post was updated on 31-Oct-2008.)
![[Creative Commons Logo]](/wp-content/themes/local/cc-by-na-sa-30-us-88x31.png){kind=small}
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 543 Howard Street, 5th Floor, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA.
5 Comments
They’ve now got a click-through contract. Gripes on their forums.
Thank you, Rick. Those links are too interesting to be hidden in a comment. I posted an update on the lawsuit following the links plus a little bit of other information.
Peter’s Wayback machine link has been dead for a week. The internet archive has a slightly earlier snapshot
More problems with the blog’s URL filter.
Copy/paste:
http://web.archive.org/web/20080103002708/http://www.endnote.com/support/enstyles.asp
Thanks again, Rick. I didn’t think Wayback Machine versions were supposed to disappear in quite this way. I’ve linked back to the January 3rd version, as you suggested.
20 Trackbacks
[...] to follow the paper trail? The Disruptive Library Technology Jester explains how. And Jystar raises a fascinating issue: “law suits like this really make me [...]
[...] citation management program Zotero (hat tip to my colleague Paolo Mangiafico for directing me to this story), I wasn’t sure how it was relevant to issues of copyright and scholarly communications. [...]
[...] owned by Reuters (click here for the complaint specifics), the news wire service. According to the DLTJ blog, Reuters is suing the Zotero project for enabling users to convert from Endnote’s proprietary [...]
[...] Outline on Disruptive Library Technology Jester More Extracts and Discussion at Disruptive Library Technology Jester James Grimmelmann Legal Commentary More Legal Comments at Discourse.net Mention and Comments at Slashdot [...]
[...] was removed from the code.)EndNode Styles Site now behind a Click-Through LicenseDLTJ reader Rick reports that the EndNote Output Styles site now redirects to a click-through license that you must accept. [...]
[...] the ins and outs of programing code, etc. Something that did grab my attention was an update on DLTJ. The Thomson Reuters quote is in the first paragraph, followed by the DLTJ comment: Following [...]
[...] I would agree that the greatest ideas of the web are yet to be realised, however it is not our imagination holding us back nor is it for lack of brilliant inventor-developers; what has destroyed the bright future of our generation is not the number of genius’ we’ve created but rather that consumer culture that requires every innnovative step along the way to be copyrighted! It is simple, we know the future, we have the vision, we even have the technology in place to do all we dream of; but, we are not allowed to put together the parts that will invent the next light bulb, car or airplane! The Wright Brothers did not have to request permission for the copyright propellar rotation, Ford did not check the moral rights of the throtle, and Edidson did not have to request biomedical permission to use a filament. And yet he were are having to wait for the legal legislation that will allow us to create an application for a gradebook app or use the code to cite public works. [...]
[...] downloaded as an extension to the Firefox web browser. This is worth investigating. Incidentally, Zotero is being sued by The Thomson Scientific division of Reuters who produce EndNote, a similar application but one [...]
[...] George Mason University Sued by Thomson Reuters over Zotero | Disruptive Library Technology Jester. [...]
[...] the State of the Union can get too drunk to do their jobs right, or maybe it’s just because Thomson Reuters just has little respect for human knowledge–either way, Thomson Reuters is introducing new “machine readable” news systems [...]
Post a Comment