In this week’s news we still have activity on legislation before the U.S. Congress on measures to protect intellectual property on the internet. This is serious stuff with serious people trying to make this go quietly into law. Well, it may not go quietly into law, but it has enough money-enabled lobbyists behind it that the legislation might become the law of the land. Closer to the profession is the publication of costs associated with various forms of resource sharing at Ohio State University. Finally, tips for communicating well with IT staff.

Feel free to send this to others you think might be interested in the topics. If you find these threads interesting and useful, you might want to add the Thursday Threads RSS Feed to your feed reader or subscribe to e-mail delivery using the form to the right. If you would like a more raw and immediate version of these types of stories, watch my FriendFeed stream (or subscribe to its feed in your feed reader). Comments and tips, as always, are welcome.

Proposed Alternative Legislation to SOPA/PROTECT-IP

Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) and Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) have released a draft of OPEN: Online Protection & Enforcement of Digital Trade Act, intended as an alternative to SOPA/PROTECT-IP. (See my prior posts opposing SOPA and linkwrapping the discussion.) Unlike SOPA’s disgustingly blatant rent-seeking, which was such an over-the-top abuse of the legislative process that it did not (and could not) support a principled or even intelligent conversations about it, OPEN provides a useful starting point for a sensible conversation that could actually lead to acceptable compromises.

For that reason alone, I think Congress should immediately stop all work on SOPA/PROTECT-IP and redirect that energy towards vetting this proposal. Having said that, for reasons I’ll explain in a moment, I continue to believe the assumptions underlying SOPA/PROTECT-IP and OPEN are misguided, meaning that forging a compromise from OPEN’s more sensible proposal may be tricky.

- The OPEN Act: significantly flawed, but more salvageable than SOPA/PROTECT-IP, by Eric Goldman, Ars Technica

I’ve written here opposing SOPA and opposing PROTECT-IP, two measures before Congress now that would (in my humble opinion) inflict harsh measures on suspected intellectual property piracy activity with insufficient judicial oversight. A champion for the anti-SOPA/PROTECTIP activity is Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon and, along with Representative Darrell Issa of California, has introduced an alternative called OPEN: Online Protection & ENforcement of Digital Trade Act on a website that invites public comment on the text of the bill. As Eric points out in the above article, it isn’t great but it is significantly better if legislation on the topic is deemed necessary.

This is important stuff, and I encourage you to get educated and make your opinions known to your members in the House and Senate.

Cost Averages for Resource Sharing: Interlibrary Services, Circulation paging and OhioLINK

The cost areas of the study include Circulation services where a user pages a book and chooses to pick it up at a library ($2.03) or have it delivered to their campus office/dorm ($2.78) i.e. zmail. OhioLINK PCIRC data is costed out as well: both borrowing for our users ($3.06) and lending to OhioLINK patrons ($3.84). For Interlibrary Services, the study examines document delivery ($7.83) as well as borrowing ($8.63 for copies; $18.85 for loans) and lending ($0.47 for copies; $2.70 for loans).

- From the Director – December 7, 2011 – Cost Averages for Resource Sharing – Interlibrary Services, Circulation paging and OhioLINK – Guest Entry from Tony Maniaci (Circulation) and Brian Miller (Interlibrary Services), from the [Ohio State University Library] Director

This study offers some real numbers on the cost of circulating physical and digital copies to patrons at a major university. The PCIRC system, for those that aren’t familiar with OhioLINK lingo, is the patron-initiated librarian-unmediated inter-institution system pioneered by Ohio academic libraries and Innovative Interfaces. The reason the costs are dramatically different from typical ILL is that the requests and circulation transactions (paging slips, item routing, and checkout/checkin) are handled as close as possible to normal circulation transaction. The goal was to make the workflow as close to a local circulation as possible, thereby driving down the cost per transaction. It looks like there is one cost not factored into the OhioLINK portion — that of the software maintenance costs for the Innovative Interfaces system. For the OhioLINK central server, that cost is borne by a biannual state appropriation to the OhioLINK offices.

As one of the technologists that helped push the early OhioLINK PCIRC system along, it pleases me immensely that the payback to Ohio libraries is still so clear.

How to get a (better) response from your Systems Librarian / Sys Admin / Helpdesk Support Elf

After about 10 years supporting IT in libraries, I feel the festive need to spread some goodwill and have tried to scrawl down a few tips to help Librarians and their systems support folk better work together.

I’ve tried not to patronise, all of the below is based on personal experience in several roles. I know we as help providers can often do better, but equally, things can go much more smoothly if we get useful information upfront and some effort to manage expectation is made.

- How to get a (better) response from your Systems Librarian / Sys Admin / Helpdesk Support Elf, Ed Chamberlain’s blog

Ed’s post is the most complete, concise, and appropriately-humored description of what staff can do to support IT and what expectations they should have of IT staff. Print this out, post it to your wall, follow its advice, and we’ll all be more happy as well as productive in the end. Seriously.

This is an announcement posted by the State Library of Ohio regarding the selection of FulfILLment from Equinox for a statewide resource sharing system.

OPEN SOURCE STATEWIDE RESOURCE SHARING SYSTEM PROPOSAL FROM EQUINOX HAS BEEN ACCEPTED.

The State Library of Ohio is pleased to announce Equinox Software Inc. has been selected to develop a new open source resource sharing solution called Equinox FulfILLment. The goal of the project is to develop a seamless resource sharing application under an open source licensing framework in an environment of disparate integrated library systems (ILSs).

An Open Source Statewide Resource Sharing Request for Proposal (RFP) was issued on December 15, 2008. The RFP process and acceptance of the Equinox proposal are the result of a collaborative effort, initiated by the State Library of Ohio, of multiple State Libraries and regional library network providers. This resource sharing system will first be deployed in Ohio, but will also be deployed individually by the members of the Collaborative.

“This is a very exciting and promising collaborative effort,” said State Librarian of Ohio Jo Budler. “We have a common vision of how resource sharing should work and how this would benefit the residents of each of our states. But this is the first time that I recall so many state libraries and statewide networks have been successful in combining resources toward such a shared vision and goal.”

Members of the Collaborative include:

• State Library of Ohio
• OHIONET (fiscal agent)
• WiLS – Wisconsin Library Service
• State Library of Iowa
• State Library of Illinois
• State Library of Indiana
• State Library of Missouri
• State Library of South Carolina

Information about the RFP process can be found at http://www.library.ohio.gov/swrs/rfp and future updates of the Equinox FulfILLment development process will be posted to our Statewide Resource Sharing homepage at http://www.library.ohio.gov/swrs.

The text was modified to update a link from http://www.library.ohio.gov/swrs/rfp to http://replay.waybackmachine.org/20090320000000/http://www.library.ohio.gov/swrs/rfp/ on February 11th, 2011.