One of the key activities that brought me to LYRASIS many months ago is going to see the light of day in about 10 days at ALA Midwinter — a set of tools to help libraries determine if open source software is right for them and what open source software works the best. Here is the announcement snippet from today’s LYRASIS newsletter:

If you’ve been following DLTJ you’ve probably seen evidence of what we’re preparing in a call for consultants to write me self-guided decision support tools and a post seeking feedback on a software registry design. That work is going to be released just prior to Midwinter and I’ll be leading people through how to use it during these one-hour in-person and online sessions. These tools will be available to all, so if you are interested please let me know.

There is an announcement on the OLE Project site that links to the final report as submitted to the Mellon Foundation. This version of the report has minor corrections in the text and now includes information about the group of libraries that have committed to the build phase of the project. Those libraries are:

• Indiana University (lead)
• Florida Consortium (University of Florida, Florida International University, Florida State University, New College of Florida, Rollins College, University of Central Florida, University of Miami, University of South Florida, and the Florida Center for Library Automation)
• Lehigh University
• Triangle Research Libraries Network (Duke University and North Carolina State University participating)
• University of Chicago
• University of Maryland
• University of Michigan
• University of Pennsylvania

The project is also listed as being in the incubation phase on the Kuali website.

The past few weeks have seen announcements of large digital preservation programs. I find it interesting that the National Science Foundation is involved in both of them.

Sustainable Digital Data Preservation and Access Network Partners

Science and engineering research and education are increasingly digital and increasingly data-intensive. Digital data are not only the output of research but provide input to new hypotheses, enabling new scientific insights and driving innovation. Therein lies one of the major challenges of this scientific generation: how to develop the new methods, management structures and technologies to manage the diversity, size, and complexity of current and future data sets and data streams. This solicitation addresses that challenge by creating a set of exemplar national and global data research infrastructure organizations (dubbed DataNet Partners) that provide unique opportunities to communities of researchers to advance science and/or engineering research and learning.

The introduction in the solicitation goes on to say:

Chapter 3 (Data, Data Analysis, and Visualization) of NSF’s Cyberinfrastructure Vision for 21^st Century Discovery presents a vision in which “science and engineering digital data are routinely deposited in well-documented form, are regularly and easily consulted and analyzed by specialists and non-specialists alike, are openly accessible while suitably protected, and are reliably preserved.” The goal of this solicitation is to catalyze the development of a system of science and engineering data collections that is open, extensible and evolvable.

The full program solicitation is available (here’s a hint if the left side of the PDF version is cut off when printing — in the Acrobat print dialog, reduce the document size to 94% of the paper size). There will be up to five awards of $20 million each for five years with the possibility of continuing funding.

The part that I find interesting, from a library technologist’s perspective, is this: “Successfully providing stability for long-term preservation and agility both to embrace constant technological change and to engage evolving research challenges requires a novel combination of expertise in library and archival sciences, computer, computational, and information sciences, cyberinfrastructure, and the other domain sciences and engineering. A goal of this solicitation is to support the creation of new types of organizations that fully integrate all of these capabilities.” Undertaking such an endeavor must be a truly cross-discipline attempt — marrying up the best of library and archive practices with other forms of science and engineering to accomplish the task.

It would seem that the Fedora Commons platform is a great starting point for the technological infrastructure. It is as if the solicitation could have been written with Fedora in mind: “content heterogeneity requires that each awardee create a resource that serves a broad disciplinary and subject matter range, manages a diverse array of data types and formats, and provides the capability to support collections at the research, resource, and reference levels.” Another component of the program goals — developing models for economic and technological sustainability — is similar to OhioLINK’s attempts to aggregate the creation and support of content repositories at state-wide economies of scale.

Peter Brantley, Executive Director of the Digital Library Federation, has established a group on Nature’s Network service for those who want to collaborate or get further information (open to participation from anyone, but registration is required). There is a kernel of a group in Ohio that are considering the possibility of a joint application; if interested, please let me know. Peter also has a post on the topic on O’Reilly’s Radar.

Blue Ribbon Task Force on Sustainable Digital Preservation and Access

In its final report, the Task Force is charged with developing a comprehensive analysis of current issues, and actionable recommendations for the future to catalyze the development of sustainable resource strategies for the reliable preservation of digital information. During its tenure, the Task Force also will produce a series of articles about the challenges and opportunities of digital information preservation, for both the scholarly community and the public.¹

The only news so far appears to be the press releases linked above. Now I recognize it is a two year effort and they only got started late last month, but I half expect some public face to the work of the task force to be available somewhere, even in the early stages. If DLTJ readers see anything, please mention it in this posting’s comments.

Footnotes

1. From the OCLC press release.