The plenary session of JCDL this morning was Jonathan Zittrain (Harvard Law School and University of Oxford) entitled “Open Information: Redaction, Restriction, and Removal.” This was so good that I couldn’t stand to stop and take notes. I did write down one bit: “Libraries are the best hope…for the controlled release of information.” His point was that the library profession is a trusted gatekeeper — librarians have a track record of providing orderly access to shared information resources and taking seriously the responsibility to provide access to those resources under the terms with which they were acquired. (Although there was a great deal of humming in the room at one key point of the presentation — those that were there know what I mean.) Can publishers entrust content to us such that the library controls the DRM that protects the content? Would publishers be willing to give the library the content in an unrestricted form with the promise, in the form of a legal agreement, that the library will apply the appropriate DRM at the appropriate time? Could that be a new role for libraries in this new DRM-happy society?
Permanent link to this post (191 words, estimated 46 secs reading time)
Also tagged drm, libraries, zittrain
Fixing a Mac OSX Leopard Login Loop Caused by Launch Services:
Is OCLC's Change of WorldCat Record Use/Transfer Policy Related to the Google Book Search Agreement?:
"Draft Principles for Digitized Content" from the Digitization Policy Task Force of ALA's Office for Information Technology Policy:
George Mason University Sued by Thomson Reuters over Zotero:
Out of Print Books Get New Life via Amazon and Participating Libraries:
Colorado Community College System Announces Flat-price Electronic Textbooks from Pearson Education: