<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	> <channel><title>Comments on: Online Editions of Out-of-Print Books Result from Library/Press Partnership at Univ of Pittsburgh</title> <atom:link href="http://dltj.org/article/upitt-library-press/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://dltj.org/article/upitt-library-press/</link> <description>We&#039;re Disrupted, We&#039;re Librarians, and We&#039;re Not Going to Take It Anymore</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:48:39 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: McG Productions Ltd</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/upitt-library-press/comment-page-1/#comment-44397</link> <dc:creator>McG Productions Ltd</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 18:50:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/?p=984#comment-44397</guid> <description>When Amazon.com states works that have only just been published with new ISBNs are &#039;out of print&#039; because publishers and authors either can&#039;t (because foreign company with no US bank account) or won&#039;t do a deal with them (because Amazon demand 55% of the list price/rrp, which only encourages publishers to raise the list price artificially, working against the consumer interest), one wonders how long it would be before simply stating &#039;out of print&#039; - when it is no such thing - would itself be enough to trigger a rights grab by Google, or some other online giant. The abuse of power is staggeringly virulent even among the most apparently forward-thinking and modern of companies. Not only should Google not be allowed to do this, for even suggesting such a wholesale rights-theft they should be shut down. They have gone beyond irresponsible and planted their giant jack-boots squarely in the scary zone of fascist dictatorships. That’s really not overstating the case. This is a hideous, hideous, hideous idea that could only spring from the imagination of the truly soulless. Go away Google. Your pretence as a force for good has now been well and truly exposed as the anti-human tool it really is. You care nothing for art, or talent, or human endeavour, or hopes and dreams. You care nothing for toil and sweat and diligence and individuality and imagination. Someone creates something? So what, let&#039;s steal it and sell it. We get the picture. Screw them; screw anyone naive enough to think their individual effort should be respected in any way. There’s a book out called ‘The Attempted Murder of God: Hidden Science You Really Need To Know’ in which it touches on the rampant greed and callous disregard big business has shown for the ordinary folk of the world and one would never before this have imagined that anyone could reasonably name Google in such bad company. That, sadly, has now changed. We all believed in Google. We all believed it was something special. We viewed the way it treated its employees and championed disaster-relief and recognized noble thinkers and creators from the past on its home page.  It was a business, sure it was, and it was about profits, of course it was, but it seemed itself to want to walk that same noble path through history as those it recognized on its site. What a difference a day makes. Google is now history.Let’s hope the next online giant doesn’t think they can be so cavalier with people’s talent.The only way out of this for Google – and I hope they take it – is to offer a massive apology for the unconscionable cheek and vow never to go near the topic again. Anything less and the damage to their reputation remains and anyone who continues to use Google to search online before they do so is complicit in this same ignoble enterprise. McG Productions Ltd for one is now moving to Microsoft’s Live Search. The vote with the feet is the strongest online protest of all.McG Productions Ltd Publisher http://www.mcgproductionsltd.com</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Amazon.com states works that have only just been published with new ISBNs are &#8216;out of print&#8217; because publishers and authors either can&#8217;t (because foreign company with no US bank account) or won&#8217;t do a deal with them (because Amazon demand 55% of the list price/rrp, which only encourages publishers to raise the list price artificially, working against the consumer interest), one wonders how long it would be before simply stating &#8216;out of print&#8217; &#8211; when it is no such thing &#8211; would itself be enough to trigger a rights grab by Google, or some other online giant. The abuse of power is staggeringly virulent even among the most apparently forward-thinking and modern of companies. Not only should Google not be allowed to do this, for even suggesting such a wholesale rights-theft they should be shut down. They have gone beyond irresponsible and planted their giant jack-boots squarely in the scary zone of fascist dictatorships. That’s really not overstating the case. This is a hideous, hideous, hideous idea that could only spring from the imagination of the truly soulless. Go away Google. Your pretence as a force for good has now been well and truly exposed as the anti-human tool it really is. You care nothing for art, or talent, or human endeavour, or hopes and dreams. You care nothing for toil and sweat and diligence and individuality and imagination. Someone creates something? So what, let&#8217;s steal it and sell it. We get the picture. Screw them; screw anyone naive enough to think their individual effort should be respected in any way. There’s a book out called ‘The Attempted Murder of God: Hidden Science You Really Need To Know’ in which it touches on the rampant greed and callous disregard big business has shown for the ordinary folk of the world and one would never before this have imagined that anyone could reasonably name Google in such bad company. That, sadly, has now changed. We all believed in Google. We all believed it was something special. We viewed the way it treated its employees and championed disaster-relief and recognized noble thinkers and creators from the past on its home page.  It was a business, sure it was, and it was about profits, of course it was, but it seemed itself to want to walk that same noble path through history as those it recognized on its site. What a difference a day makes. Google is now history.</p><p> Let’s hope the next online giant doesn’t think they can be so cavalier with people’s talent.</p><p> The only way out of this for Google – and I hope they take it – is to offer a massive apology for the unconscionable cheek and vow never to go near the topic again. Anything less and the damage to their reputation remains and anyone who continues to use Google to search online before they do so is complicit in this same ignoble enterprise. McG Productions Ltd for one is now moving to Microsoft’s Live Search. The vote with the feet is the strongest online protest of all.</p><p>McG Productions Ltd<br /> Publisher<br /> <a href="http://www.mcgproductionsltd.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.mcgproductionsltd.com</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Teramis</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/upitt-library-press/comment-page-1/#comment-37119</link> <dc:creator>Teramis</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:48:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/?p=984#comment-37119</guid> <description>I am continually delighted at the ever-increasing numbers of oop titles finding their way into electronic formats. Thanks for this information and the links. Will definitely be trolling through that collection later.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am continually delighted at the ever-increasing numbers of oop titles finding their way into electronic formats. Thanks for this information and the links. Will definitely be trolling through that collection later.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Academic Newswire</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/upitt-library-press/comment-page-1/#comment-36200</link> <dc:creator>Academic Newswire</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 20:19:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/?p=984#comment-36200</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] NotePeter Murray, on his Disruptive Library Technology Jester blog, has posted notes from a conversation with Rush Miller, library director at the University of Pittsburgh, about the school&#039;s joint effort with the [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cdn.dltj.org/wp-content/plugins/kramer/kramer.gif" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" />[...] NotePeter Murray, on his Disruptive Library Technology Jester blog, has posted notes from a conversation with Rush Miller, library director at the University of Pittsburgh, about the school&#8217;s joint effort with the [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Peter Suber, Open Access News</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/upitt-library-press/comment-page-1/#comment-36169</link> <dc:creator>Peter Suber, Open Access News</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 21:31:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/?p=984#comment-36169</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] on OA at U. Pittsburgh Press   Peter Murray, Online Editions of Out-of-Print Books Results from Library/Press Partnership at Univ of Pittsburgh, Disruptive Library Technology Jester, May 26, 2009. ... Earlier today, I had a conversation with [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cdn.dltj.org/wp-content/plugins/kramer/kramer.gif" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" />[...] on OA at U. Pittsburgh Press   Peter Murray, Online Editions of Out-of-Print Books Results from Library/Press Partnership at Univ of Pittsburgh, Disruptive Library Technology Jester, May 26, 2009. &#8230; Earlier today, I had a conversation with [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Peter Murray</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/upitt-library-press/comment-page-1/#comment-160036</link> <dc:creator>Peter Murray</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 00:54:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/?p=984#comment-160036</guid> <description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;New blog post: Online Editions of Out-of-Print Books Results from Library/Press Partnership at Univ of Pittsburgh http://bit.ly/HQ0CM&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">New blog post: Online Editions of Out-of-Print Books Results from Library/Press Partnership at Univ of Pittsburgh <a href="http://bit.ly/HQ0CM" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/HQ0CM</a></span></span></span></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: dltj.org @ 2012-02-11 14:44:45 by W3 Total Cache -->
