<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	> <channel><title>Comments on: Two Personal Repository Services</title> <atom:link href="http://dltj.org/article/two-personal-repository-services/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://dltj.org/article/two-personal-repository-services/</link> <description>We&#039;re Disrupted, We&#039;re Librarians, and We&#039;re Not Going to Take It Anymore</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 16:01:37 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Fred Howell</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/two-personal-repository-services/comment-page-1/#comment-35541</link> <dc:creator>Fred Howell</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 17:08:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2007/06/two-personal-repository-services/#comment-35541</guid> <description>Just to let you know... the final report for the EM-Loader collaboration between publicationslist and the Depot is now up on:http://publicationslist.org/em-loaderThere are some screencast demos of the deposit process into ePrints, using SWORD and some other APIs for syncing between a personal publications list and a set of entries in the repository.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to let you know&#8230; the final report for the EM-Loader collaboration between publicationslist and the Depot is now up on:</p><p><a href="http://publicationslist.org/em-loader" rel="nofollow">http://publicationslist.org/em-loader</a></p><p>There are some screencast demos of the deposit process into ePrints, using SWORD and some other APIs for syncing between a personal publications list and a set of entries in the repository.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: the Jester</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/two-personal-repository-services/comment-page-1/#comment-33937</link> <dc:creator>the Jester</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 23:49:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2007/06/two-personal-repository-services/#comment-33937</guid> <description>Thank you for the follow up!  I&#039;ll take a look at the report.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the follow up!  I&#8217;ll take a look at the report.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Theo Andrew</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/two-personal-repository-services/comment-page-1/#comment-33933</link> <dc:creator>Theo Andrew</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 09:10:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2007/06/two-personal-repository-services/#comment-33933</guid> <description>In case you are still interested some of the initial outcomes of the EM-Loader project are available online at:http://publicationslist.org/em-loader/index.html</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case you are still interested some of the initial outcomes of the EM-Loader project are available online at:</p><p><a href="http://publicationslist.org/em-loader/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://publicationslist.org/em-loader/index.html</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: the Jester</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/two-personal-repository-services/comment-page-1/#comment-31983</link> <dc:creator>the Jester</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 01:33:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2007/06/two-personal-repository-services/#comment-31983</guid> <description>Great to hear, Peter.  It is neat to see that some strains of thoughts here sparked a collaboration there.  I went looking for information on EM-LOADER but couldn&#039;t find anything.  Perhaps you could post an link when information becomes publicly available.  Thanks for the follow up!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great to hear, Peter.  It is neat to see that some strains of thoughts here sparked a collaboration there.  I went looking for information on EM-LOADER but couldn&#8217;t find anything.  Perhaps you could post an link when information becomes publicly available.  Thanks for the follow up!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Peter Burnhill</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/two-personal-repository-services/comment-page-1/#comment-31742</link> <dc:creator>Peter Burnhill</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:52:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2007/06/two-personal-repository-services/#comment-31742</guid> <description>I thought you should know that the two organisations behind the Depot and publicationslist.org are working together in a project called EM-LOADER which aims to combine the best aspects of both services.  Strangely enough we are both in Edinburgh, having been introduced to one another by a blogger from the other side of the Pond!Peter</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought you should know that the two organisations behind the Depot and publicationslist.org are working together in a project called EM-LOADER which aims to combine the best aspects of both services.  Strangely enough we are both in Edinburgh, having been introduced to one another by a blogger from the other side of the Pond!</p><p>Peter</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bibliometría &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Publications List: get more citations</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/two-personal-repository-services/comment-page-1/#comment-21552</link> <dc:creator>Bibliometría &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Publications List: get more citations</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 07:27:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2007/06/two-personal-repository-services/#comment-21552</guid> <description>[...] Disruptive Library Technology Jester ofrece un interesante análisis comparativo entre el servicio que ofrece Publications list y el ofrecido por The Depot. Lo podeis leer en Two Personal Repository Services. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Disruptive Library Technology Jester ofrece un interesante análisis comparativo entre el servicio que ofrece Publications list y el ofrecido por The Depot. Lo podeis leer en Two Personal Repository Services. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: PublicationsList.org - news - online publications lists</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/two-personal-repository-services/comment-page-1/#comment-18205</link> <dc:creator>PublicationsList.org - news - online publications lists</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 16:37:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2007/06/two-personal-repository-services/#comment-18205</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] A comparison of publicationslist.org and The Depot - two personal repository services - on Peter Mur...      &#169; 2007 Textensor Limited, providers of PublicationsList.org     _uacct = &quot;UA-1704251-1&quot;; urchinTracker(); [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cdn.dltj.org/wp-content/plugins/kramer/kramer.gif" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" />[...] A comparison of publicationslist.org and The Depot &#8211; two personal repository services &#8211; on Peter Mur&#8230;      &copy; 2007 Textensor Limited, providers of PublicationsList.org     _uacct = &#8220;UA-1704251-1&#8243;; urchinTracker(); [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: The Random Ramblings of a Mutterer...</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/two-personal-repository-services/comment-page-1/#comment-17697</link> <dc:creator>The Random Ramblings of a Mutterer...</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:09:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2007/06/two-personal-repository-services/#comment-17697</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;http://dltj.org/2007/06/two-personal-repository-services/&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="technorati-balloon" href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?url=http://dltj.org/article/two-personal-repository-services/"><img src="http://static.technorati.com/images/bubble_h17.gif" class="technorati-balloon" alt="links from Technorati" style="border:0;" /></a><a href="http://dltj.org/2007/06/two-personal-repository-services/" rel="nofollow">http://dltj.org/2007/06/two-personal-repository-services/</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: the jester</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/two-personal-repository-services/comment-page-1/#comment-17468</link> <dc:creator>the jester</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 14:54:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2007/06/two-personal-repository-services/#comment-17468</guid> <description>Hello, Fred -- thanks for posting a comment.  You are a bit lucky in the U.K. since researchers in that country are motivated by the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rae.ac.uk/&quot; title=&quot;U.K. Research Assessment Exercise homepage&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Research Assessment Exercise&lt;/a&gt; to make their works widely accessible.  (The Australians share the same motivating factor.)  As the Cornell paper outlines, in the U.S. the motivation tends to come more from recognition within the discipline rather than with the institution.  Thus we have seen the growth of discipline-specific archives.  Academic researchers here tend to have a need to fill out &quot;faculty activity reports&quot; of which the publications list is just one part.Thanks for the clarification about exporting citations -- I missed that in my review.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, Fred &#8212; thanks for posting a comment.  You are a bit lucky in the U.K. since researchers in that country are motivated by the <a href="http://www.rae.ac.uk/" title="U.K. Research Assessment Exercise homepage" rel="nofollow">Research Assessment Exercise</a> to make their works widely accessible.  (The Australians share the same motivating factor.)  As the Cornell paper outlines, in the U.S. the motivation tends to come more from recognition within the discipline rather than with the institution.  Thus we have seen the growth of discipline-specific archives.  Academic researchers here tend to have a need to fill out &#8220;faculty activity reports&#8221; of which the publications list is just one part.</p><p>Thanks for the clarification about exporting citations &#8212; I missed that in my review.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Fred Howell</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/two-personal-repository-services/comment-page-1/#comment-17463</link> <dc:creator>Fred Howell</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 13:56:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2007/06/two-personal-repository-services/#comment-17463</guid> <description>[from one of the publicationslist.org developers] An interesting comparison - I like the observation that the main problem is to motivate researchers to put their publications online. With publicationslist.org we thought that people would be more motivated to make their own online publications list look good than to submit to an institutional / central repository - perhaps the answer is a combination of the two. &lt;a href=&quot;http://publicationslist.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;publicationslist.org&lt;/a&gt; does include a bibliographic export feature - e.g. click on an article title or one of the grey triangles in &lt;a href=&quot;http://publicationslist.org/rcc&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this sample list&lt;/a&gt; and you should see the abstract as well as the export links (to bibtex / endnote / RIS etc). It&#039;s also possible to select &amp; export multiple articles in these formats from the edit page of your own publications list.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[from one of the publicationslist.org developers]<br /> An interesting comparison &#8211; I like the observation that the main problem is to motivate researchers to put their publications online. With publicationslist.org we thought that people would be more motivated to make their own online publications list look good than to submit to an institutional / central repository &#8211; perhaps the answer is a combination of the two.</p><p><a href="http://publicationslist.org" rel="nofollow">publicationslist.org</a> does include a bibliographic export feature &#8211; e.g. click on an article title or one of the grey triangles in <a href="http://publicationslist.org/rcc" rel="nofollow">this sample list</a> and you should see the abstract as well as the export links (to bibtex / endnote / RIS etc).<br /> It&#8217;s also possible to select &amp; export multiple articles in these formats from the edit page of your own publications list.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: dltj.org @ 2012-05-23 22:41:56 by W3 Total Cache -->
