We’re taking a break this week from the HarperCollins e-book story; although the commentary continues from librarians (and a few authors), there hasn’t been anything new (that I’ve seen) from HarperCollins itself. There is still plenty more to look at, though. First up is a report from the health care sector on the applicability of open source and open systems. Next is an interview with a financial analyst that sees the end of the “big deal” for library journal subscriptions. And lastly is a list of web archive services that you could use to find old copies of web pages.
Feel free to send this to others you think might be interested in the topics. If you find these threads interesting and useful, you might want to add the Thursday Threads RSS Feed to your feed reader or subscribe to e-mail delivery using the form to the right. If you would like a more raw and immediate version of these types of stories, watch my FriendFeed stream (or subscribe to its feed in your feed reader). Comments and tips, as always, are welcome.
Open Source, Open Standards, and Health Care Information Systems
Recognition of the improvements in patient safety, quality of patient care, and efficiency that health care information systems have the potential to bring has led to significant investment. Globally the sale of health care information systems now represents a multibillion dollar industry. As policy makers, health care professionals, and patients, we have a responsibility to maximize the return on this investment. To this end we analyze alternative licensing and software development models, as well as the role of standards. We describe how licensing affects development. We argue for the superiority of open source licensing to promote safer, more effective health care information systems. We claim that open source licensing in health care information systems is essential to rational procurement strategy.
This might be a useful data point for libraries considering the adoption of open source for their mission-critical applications. Two U.K. authors have published a report that reviews general benefits of open source and open standards, noting in one heading that “Open Standards Facilitate Competition Between Open Source Software and Proprietary Software”. They also compare the open source software development practices with those of proprietary software development and look at barriers to the adoption of open source software. A great deal of the analysis is particular to health care information systems, but the report would be a useful template to applying the same analysis to core library systems. [Via ACM TechNews]
Reynolds, Carl J., & Wyatt, Jeremy C. (2011). Open Source, Open Standards, and Health Care Information Systems Journal of Medical Internet Research, 13 (1) DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1521
The Demise of the Big Deal?
Interview question: You, however, believe that publishers will simply have to accept that their revenues are going to fall, because there really is no more money?
Claudio Aspesi: I have no doubt that — over time — adjustments would be made. But it remains to be seen if they need all the 2,200/2,400 journals that the each of the largest publishers maintain today.
You know, my job is not to pass judgement on how people run their business or to decry capitalism, only to advise investors whether they should buy or sell stocks.
I can observe, however, that there is something unhealthy about an industry which has managed to alienate its customers to the point their membership associations increasingly focus time and attention on how to overturn the industry structure. It is not a good thing to have your customers spend their time trying to put you out of business.
Richard Poynder interviews Claudio Aspesi, a financial analyst based at the sell-side research firm Sanford Bernstein. Aspesi issued a report last year that was critical of the financial outlook of Reed Elsevier and more recently has downgraded the outlook to “underperform”. This interview gets into the reasoning behind Aspesi’s decision.
Archives of Dead Web Pages: Wayback, Cache, and More
The Web changes constantly, and sometimes that page that had just the information you needed yesterday (or last month or two years ago) is not available today. At other times you may want to see how a page’s content or design has changed. There are several sources for finding Web pages as they used to exist. While Google’s cache is probably the best known, the others are important alternatives that may have pages not available at Google or the Wayback Machine plus they may have an archived page from a different date. The table below notes the name of the service, the way to find the archived page, and some notes that should give some idea as to how old a page the archive may contain.
Although this list is over three years old, many of the services are still active. One addition of note is a beta test version of the Internet Archive’s Wayback machine; it includes an improved interface and a more up-to-date archive of pages.