<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stereotypical Vendors?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dltj.org/article/stereotypical-vendors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dltj.org/article/stereotypical-vendors/</link>
	<description>We&#039;re Disrupted, We&#039;re Librarians, and We&#039;re Not Going to Take It Anymore</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:47:21 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: morganusvitus</title>
		<link>http://dltj.org/article/stereotypical-vendors/comment-page-1/#comment-13695</link>
		<dc:creator>morganusvitus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 13:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2007/03/stereotypical-vendors/#comment-13695</guid>
		<description>The site looks great ! Thanks for all your help ( past, present and future !)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The site looks great ! Thanks for all your help ( past, present and future !)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caveat Lector</title>
		<link>http://dltj.org/article/stereotypical-vendors/comment-page-1/#comment-13686</link>
		<dc:creator>Caveat Lector</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 02:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2007/03/stereotypical-vendors/#comment-13686</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;compliment the Talis folks on knowing how to come to a practitioner conference and, well, not act like the stereotyped sales-and-nothing-but-sales vendor.  Seems Talis has got into a bit of hot water on this point. Peter Murray has an evenhanded examination.  I wasn’t there—come on, if I tried to go to a code4lib conference they’d run my churlish miscreant self out of town on a rail, tarred and feathered and gzip -9ed—so I haven’t the least status to say whether Talis goofed or code4lib&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="technorati-balloon" href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?url=http://dltj.org/article/stereotypical-vendors/"><img src="http://static.technorati.com/images/bubble_h17.gif" class="technorati-balloon" alt="links from Technorati" style="border:0;" /></a>compliment the Talis folks on knowing how to come to a practitioner conference and, well, not act like the stereotyped sales-and-nothing-but-sales vendor.  Seems Talis has got into a bit of hot water on this point. Peter Murray has an evenhanded examination.  I wasn’t there—come on, if I tried to go to a code4lib conference they’d run my churlish miscreant self out of town on a rail, tarred and feathered and gzip -9ed—so I haven’t the least status to say whether Talis goofed or code4lib</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the jester</title>
		<link>http://dltj.org/article/stereotypical-vendors/comment-page-1/#comment-13687</link>
		<dc:creator>the jester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 01:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2007/03/stereotypical-vendors/#comment-13687</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;13575&quot;]Thanks for your inciteful view on this much of which I agree with.[/quote]

So, Richard, I&#039;ve got to ask.  Was &quot;incite-ful&quot; your intended word, or perhaps it was to be &quot;insight-ful&quot;?  I was trying to be the latter, hoping not to be the former.  ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[quote comment="13575"]Thanks for your inciteful view on this much of which I agree with.[/quote]</p>
<p>So, Richard, I&#8217;ve got to ask.  Was &#8220;incite-ful&#8221; your intended word, or perhaps it was to be &#8220;insight-ful&#8221;?  I was trying to be the latter, hoping not to be the former.  <img src='http://dltj.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Wallis</title>
		<link>http://dltj.org/article/stereotypical-vendors/comment-page-1/#comment-13575</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Wallis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 13:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2007/03/stereotypical-vendors/#comment-13575</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your inciteful view on this much of which I agree with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your inciteful view on this much of which I agree with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
