http://dltj.org/article/revised-gbs-settlement/ We're Disrupted, We're Librarians, and We're Not Going to Take It Anymore Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:48:39 +0000 hourly 1 http://dltj.org/article/revised-gbs-settlement/comment-page-1/#comment-38614 New articles of interest Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:26:09 +0000 http://dltj.org/?p=1337#comment-38614 [...] readers make lousy gifts this yearWill textbooks be the biggest e-reader market in five years?Revised Google Book Search Settlement from a Library Perspective | Disruptive Library Technology Jes...HathiTrust offers full-text search of millions of digitized books and [...] [...] readers make lousy gifts this yearWill textbooks be the biggest e-reader market in five years?Revised Google Book Search Settlement from a Library Perspective | Disruptive Library Technology Jes…HathiTrust offers full-text search of millions of digitized books and [...]

]]> http://dltj.org/article/revised-gbs-settlement/comment-page-1/#comment-38602 Google Book Settlement » News Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:15:29 +0000 http://dltj.org/?p=1337#comment-38602 <!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Disruptive Library Technology Jester: Revised Google Book Search Settlement from a Library Perspecti... [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--> [...] Disruptive Library Technology Jester: Revised Google Book Search Settlement from a Library Perspecti… [...]

]]> http://dltj.org/article/revised-gbs-settlement/comment-page-1/#comment-38597 Règlement Google Book Acte II : le grand bal des chimères « :: S.I.Lex :: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:47:00 +0000 http://dltj.org/?p=1337#comment-38597 [...] Copyright Librarians américains (Karen Coyle, Kenneth Crews, DLT Jester) se sont penchés sur le nouveau réglement et leur sentiment reste mitigé quant aux conséquences [...] [...] Copyright Librarians américains (Karen Coyle, Kenneth Crews, DLT Jester) se sont penchés sur le nouveau réglement et leur sentiment reste mitigé quant aux conséquences [...]

]]> http://dltj.org/article/revised-gbs-settlement/comment-page-1/#comment-161483 Workflow Toolkit Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:45:59 +0000 http://dltj.org/?p=1337#comment-161483 <span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Revised Google Book Search Settlement from a Library Perspective | Disruptive Library Technology Jester http://bit.ly/4utrwB</span></span> Revised Google Book Search Settlement from a Library Perspective | Disruptive Library Technology Jester http://bit.ly/4utrwB

]]> http://dltj.org/article/revised-gbs-settlement/comment-page-1/#comment-161484 Carleen Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:43:06 +0000 http://dltj.org/?p=1337#comment-161484 <span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @kepitcher: articulate, easy-to-read synthesis of what the latest Google Books amended settlement means: http://bit.ly/08WMDy8/</span></span> RT @kepitcher: articulate, easy-to-read synthesis of what the latest Google Books amended settlement means: http://bit.ly/08WMDy8/

]]> http://dltj.org/article/revised-gbs-settlement/comment-page-1/#comment-161485 Kate Pitcher Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:25:40 +0000 http://dltj.org/?p=1337#comment-161485 <span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">articulate, easy-to-read synthesis of what the latest Google Books amended settlement means: http://bit.ly/08WMDy8/</span></span> articulate, easy-to-read synthesis of what the latest Google Books amended settlement means: http://bit.ly/08WMDy8/

]]> http://dltj.org/article/revised-gbs-settlement/comment-page-1/#comment-38580 Droits d’auteur & co (22/11/09) « pintiniblog Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:21:22 +0000 http://dltj.org/?p=1337#comment-38580 <!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Revised Google Book Search Settlement from a Library Perspective (source: Disruptive Library Technology Jester, [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--> [...] Revised Google Book Search Settlement from a Library Perspective (source: Disruptive Library Technology Jester, [...]

]]> http://dltj.org/article/revised-gbs-settlement/comment-page-1/#comment-161486 Michèle Battisti Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:31:13 +0000 http://dltj.org/?p=1337#comment-161486 <span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @CopyrightLaw: “Revised Google Book Search Settlement from a Library Perspective” http://bit.ly/11xehj</span></span> RT @CopyrightLaw: “Revised Google Book Search Settlement from a Library Perspective” http://bit.ly/11xehj

]]> http://dltj.org/article/revised-gbs-settlement/comment-page-1/#comment-161487 FiledBy Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:35:19 +0000 http://dltj.org/?p=1337#comment-161487 <span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Disruptive Library Technology Jester: "Revised Google Book Search Settlement from a Library Perspective" - http://ow.ly/DVzQ</span></span> Disruptive Library Technology Jester: "Revised Google Book Search Settlement from a Library Perspective" – http://ow.ly/DVzQ

]]> http://dltj.org/article/revised-gbs-settlement/comment-page-1/#comment-161488 CopyrightLaw Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:24:00 +0000 http://dltj.org/?p=1337#comment-161488 <span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">“Revised Google Book Search Settlement from a Library Perspective” http://bit.ly/11xehj</span></span> “Revised Google Book Search Settlement from a Library Perspective” http://bit.ly/11xehj

]]>