http://dltj.org/article/passing-on-researcherid/ We're Disrupted, We're Librarians, and We're Not Going to Take It Anymore Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:48:39 +0000 hourly 1 http://dltj.org/article/passing-on-researcherid/comment-page-1/#comment-88333 "Researcher ID" - Finding Citation Counts Using Web of Science and Other Sources - LibGuides at WSU Libraries at Washington State University Mon, 13 Sep 2010 14:56:08 +0000 https://dltj.org/?p=356#comment-88333 <!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Web, or by manually uploading a file in RIS format. See also http://wokinfo.com/researcherid/Passing on Researcher IDA negative view of Researcher ID, focusing on language in its EULA limiting its use outside of the [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--> [...] Web, or by manually uploading a file in RIS format. See also http://wokinfo.com/researcherid/Passing on Researcher IDA negative view of Researcher ID, focusing on language in its EULA limiting its use outside of the [...]

]]> http://dltj.org/article/passing-on-researcherid/comment-page-1/#comment-36152 Online Engagement of Scientists with the literature: anonymity vs. ResearcherID at Synthesis Tue, 26 May 2009 00:08:10 +0000 https://dltj.org/?p=356#comment-36152 <!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] for taking the time to write a comment.(Related Blog posts from neilfws, Martin Fenner, Deepak, Peter Murray, and others on friendfeed) 3) Some people don’t want to sign their name to a critical [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--> [...] for taking the time to write a comment.(Related Blog posts from neilfws, Martin Fenner, Deepak, Peter Murray, and others on friendfeed) 3) Some people don’t want to sign their name to a critical [...]

]]> http://dltj.org/article/passing-on-researcherid/comment-page-1/#comment-35887 darcusblog » Blog Archive » Boycotting ResearcherID? - geek tools and the scholar Mon, 11 May 2009 17:47:48 +0000 https://dltj.org/?p=356#comment-35887 <!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Also, one of the commenters of the previous linked-to Arstechnica post already did performed an analysis of the service of his own: http://dltj.org/article/passing-on-researcherid/ [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--> [...] Also, one of the commenters of the previous linked-to Arstechnica post already did performed an analysis of the service of his own: http://dltj.org/article/passing-on-researcherid/ [...]

]]> http://dltj.org/article/passing-on-researcherid/comment-page-1/#comment-162463 Sébastien Dupré Wed, 06 May 2009 20:17:37 +0000 https://dltj.org/?p=356#comment-162463 <span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT: @Scopus: Author Identification, ownership and attachement of unique identifier poses controversies http://bit.ly/PNO5o</span></span> RT: @Scopus: Author Identification, ownership and attachement of unique identifier poses controversies http://bit.ly/PNO5o

]]> http://dltj.org/article/passing-on-researcherid/comment-page-1/#comment-159925 Scopus Wed, 06 May 2009 19:57:53 +0000 https://dltj.org/?p=356#comment-159925 <span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Author Identification, ownership and attachement of unique identifier poses controversies http://bit.ly/PNO5o</span></span> Author Identification, ownership and attachement of unique identifier poses controversies http://bit.ly/PNO5o

]]> http://dltj.org/article/passing-on-researcherid/comment-page-1/#comment-35534 Digitization 101: NFAIS Forum: Social Media and the Future of Scholarly Publishing - Part 2 Mon, 04 May 2009 14:57:28 +0000 https://dltj.org/?p=356#comment-35534 <!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] records can change as the faculty members changes (e.g., location).Note: Over the weekend, this blog post from May 2008 was passed along to me on ResearchID. The lesson from the blog post is to understand [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--> [...] records can change as the faculty members changes (e.g., location).Note: Over the weekend, this blog post from May 2008 was passed along to me on ResearchID. The lesson from the blog post is to understand [...]

]]> http://dltj.org/article/passing-on-researcherid/comment-page-1/#comment-35529 ResearcherID.com - Stephen Francoeur - FriendFeed Mon, 04 May 2009 13:22:42 +0000 https://dltj.org/?p=356#comment-35529 <!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] lists and explore how research is used around the world." - Stephen Francoeur See also: http://dltj.org/article... - Peter Murray Peter: Thanks for the heads up. I'll not be setting up an account there. - [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--> [...] lists and explore how research is used around the world." – Stephen Francoeur See also: http://dltj.org/article... – Peter Murray Peter: Thanks for the heads up. I’ll not be setting up an account there. – [...]

]]> http://dltj.org/article/passing-on-researcherid/comment-page-1/#comment-33176 the Jester Wed, 07 May 2008 00:04:42 +0000 https://dltj.org/?p=356#comment-33176 Dunno, but something like OpenID could be used for this purpose. The first question that comes to mind is whether multiple OpenIDs can be linked together. If it becomes commonplace for institutions to provide OpenIDs for their students, faculty, and staff, then I would need a systematic way to link together the OpenID from my graduate school and the OpenIDs of my previous employers. But OpenID would seem to solve both the identifier and authorized user issues. Dunno, but something like OpenID could be used for this purpose. The first question that comes to mind is whether multiple OpenIDs can be linked together. If it becomes commonplace for institutions to provide OpenIDs for their students, faculty, and staff, then I would need a systematic way to link together the OpenID from my graduate school and the OpenIDs of my previous employers. But OpenID would seem to solve both the identifier and authorized user issues.

]]> http://dltj.org/article/passing-on-researcherid/comment-page-1/#comment-33175 Leslie Johnston Tue, 06 May 2008 20:20:04 +0000 https://dltj.org/?p=356#comment-33175 A proprietary identifier that CANNOT be used for other services? Why couldn't they have worked with something like OpenID? Then publication authorship could be disambiguated and associated with an OpenID persona. A proprietary identifier that CANNOT be used for other services? Why couldn’t they have worked with something like OpenID? Then publication authorship could be disambiguated and associated with an OpenID persona.

]]>