Skip to content
Solely for the Purpose of Catching $PAMRZ

Can We Outsource the Preservation of Digital Bits?

A colleague forwarded an article from The Register with news of a new service from Iron Mountain for Cloud-Based File Archiving. It is billed as a “storage archiving service designed to help companies reduce costs of storing and managing static data files.” My place of work is facing an increasing need large-scale digital preservation storage with the acquisition of a large collection of music and the conversion of our educational videos from physical DVD preservation to digital preservation. We’re talking terabytes of content that is we need to keep in its archival form — uncompressed, high quality media files (not the lower quality, derivatives for day-to-day access). It doesn’t make sense to keep that on expensive SAN storage, of course, so this article struck me at just the right time to consider alternatives.

Architecture Diagram for Iron Mountain's Virtual File Store service, showing the placement of the Virtual File Store appliance relative to other assets on the data center network

Architecture Diagram for Iron Mountain's Virtual File Store service, showing the placement of the Virtual File Store appliance relative to other assets on the data center network. Graphic from product datasheet (http://www.ironmountain.com/resources/vfs/virtual_file_store_datasheet.pdf)

According to the product literature, the service works by putting a black box on your network where one can drop files via CIFS or NFS. The black box transfers the files over the internet to two Iron Mountain data centers. Files can then be retrieved via an on-line on-demand service or by exchanging physical media with Iron Mountain for bulk retrieval needs.

We know, of course, that digital preservation is more than just preserving the digital bits: it is the intellectual exercise of describing the stored information, the effort of maintaining an accurate catalog of that information, and the burden of migrating file formats or emulating platforms to read old file formats. Handling the raw bits is a big deal, too — checksumming to ensure unaltered status, refreshing files to new storage media, and protection from physical disasters. This Iron Mountain solution seems to address this more mechanical portion of digital preservation, and it one that probably can benefit from aggregating the service needs of many customers (and so is ripe for outsourcing).

Is anyone doing something similar with their physical preservation of digital media? Are there other companies that do the same thing? (I know of OCLC’s Digital Archive service — I did a comparison of it with Amazon S3 last year.)

5 Comments

  1. Melissa McCarthy | March 9, 2009 at 9:30 am | Permalink

    I know of a small archives that’s doing all their backups on Mozy. Simple, convenient, relatively idiot-proof, and with the small amount of material they currently need backed up, free.

  2. the Jester | March 9, 2009 at 9:37 am | Permalink

    Thanks, Melissa. I hadn’t considered Mozy as a preservation solution. (I had always put it strictly in the “backup” category.) It would be worth taking a look at the terms-of-service to see what they guarantee.

  3. Melissa McCarthy | March 9, 2009 at 7:21 pm | Permalink

    That’s a good point; I’ll direct them to the TOS and see if they’ve considered everything. It does seem to be satisfying them, though.

  4. Robin | March 10, 2009 at 12:17 pm | Permalink

    Mozy’s terms state “Decho reserves the right at any time to modify, suspend, or discontinue providing the Service or any part thereof in its sole discretion with or without notice. ”

    Digital preservation storage it ain’t.

  5. the Jester | March 10, 2009 at 1:00 pm | Permalink

    Robin — thanks for checking into that. Those terms are quite different from Amazon’s S3 Term, Termination and Suspension provisions. At least with S3 there is some allowance for getting the data back out again, albeit with conditions of its own.

2 Trackbacks

  1. Techno-fil (08/03/09) : pintiniblog | March 15, 2009 at 1:32 pm | Permalink

    Kramer auto Pingback[...] practical methods for creating customized end-user interfaces for distinct digital collections.” – Can We Outsource the Preservation of Digital Bits? (source: Disruptive Library Technology Jester, 05/03/09) – Anatomy of the Zotero Library to RSS [...]

  2. Techno-fil (08/03/09) « pintiniblog | January 11, 2010 at 9:29 am | Permalink

    [...] Can We Outsource the Preservation of Digital Bits? (source: Disruptive Library Technology Jester, [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *
Human Detection Scheme
(What's this?)
Comment Preview

Additional comments powered by BackType

Subscribe without commenting

From the Disruptive Library Technology Jester (http://dltj.org/), printed on Tuesday the 9th of February 2010 at 6:28:01 AM EST (-0500). The URL to this page is http://dltj.org/article/outsource-digital-bits/

[Creative Commons Logo] This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 543 Howard Street, 5th Floor, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA.