<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NISO IR Presentation: &#8220;The Third Wave of Library Information Stewardship&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dltj.org/article/niso-ir-workshop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dltj.org/article/niso-ir-workshop/</link>
	<description>We&#039;re Disrupted, We&#039;re Librarians, and We&#039;re Not Going to Take It Anymore</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:46:34 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: pintiniblog</title>
		<link>http://dltj.org/article/niso-ir-workshop/comment-page-1/#comment-28552</link>
		<dc:creator>pintiniblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 14:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2007/12/niso-ir-workshop/#comment-28552</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;- Wanted: The Right Content and the Right Content Rights (pas de prés.)    - OAI Object Re-Use &amp; Exchange (ORE)    - Distilling Strategic Directions for Repositories from Faculty and Librarian Attitudes    ViaDLTJ&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="technorati-balloon" href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?url=http://dltj.org/article/niso-ir-workshop/"><img src="http://static.technorati.com/images/bubble_h17.gif" class="technorati-balloon" alt="links from Technorati" style="border:0;" /></a>- Wanted: The Right Content and the Right Content Rights (pas de prés.)    &#8211; OAI Object Re-Use &#038; Exchange (ORE)    &#8211; Distilling Strategic Directions for Repositories from Faculty and Librarian Attitudes    ViaDLTJ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caveat Lector</title>
		<link>http://dltj.org/article/niso-ir-workshop/comment-page-1/#comment-28551</link>
		<dc:creator>Caveat Lector</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 19:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2007/12/niso-ir-workshop/#comment-28551</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;t have a viable service model for this work yet, and some of what I’ve heard lately, including on Monday at the workshop, makes me despair that one is coming. After Peter Murray’s utterly brillianttalk on intervention in digital workflowsas the “fourth wave” of library work (er, that was a spoiler, wasn’t it? oh well), an audience member asked with a certain amount of Gormanesque hauteur whether intervening in faculty digital workflows was really consonant with the library&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="technorati-balloon" href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?url=http://dltj.org/article/niso-ir-workshop/"><img src="http://static.technorati.com/images/bubble_h17.gif" class="technorati-balloon" alt="links from Technorati" style="border:0;" /></a>t have a viable service model for this work yet, and some of what I’ve heard lately, including on Monday at the workshop, makes me despair that one is coming. After Peter Murray’s utterly brillianttalk on intervention in digital workflowsas the “fourth wave” of library work (er, that was a spoiler, wasn’t it? oh well), an audience member asked with a certain amount of Gormanesque hauteur whether intervening in faculty digital workflows was really consonant with the library</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
