<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	> <channel><title>Comments on: NIH Mandatory Open Access Provision Becomes Law</title> <atom:link href="http://dltj.org/article/nih-open-access/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://dltj.org/article/nih-open-access/</link> <description>We&#039;re Disrupted, We&#039;re Librarians, and We&#039;re Not Going to Take It Anymore</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 16:01:37 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Digitaalinen kirjasto</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/nih-open-access/comment-page-1/#comment-224159</link> <dc:creator>Digitaalinen kirjasto</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 08:42:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2007/12/nih-open-access/#comment-224159</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] in Research Works Actin&#8221; päämaalina on National Institutes of Healthin (NIH) rahoittamalleen tutkimukselle asettama rinnakkaistallennusmandaatti, joka on ollut yksi open access -liikkeen toistaiseksi merkittävimmistä saavutuksista. [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cdn.dltj.org/wp-content/plugins/kramer/kramer.gif" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" />[...] in Research Works Actin&#8221; päämaalina on National Institutes of Healthin (NIH) rahoittamalleen tutkimukselle asettama rinnakkaistallennusmandaatti, joka on ollut yksi open access -liikkeen toistaiseksi merkittävimmistä saavutuksista. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Slashdot &#124; Congress May Kill NIH Open Access Research Rules</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/nih-open-access/comment-page-1/#comment-33847</link> <dc:creator>Slashdot &#124; Congress May Kill NIH Open Access Research Rules</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 22:21:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2007/12/nih-open-access/#comment-33847</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...]     Bullshit. &#160; The open access law that they are threatening to overturn wasn&#039;t enacted until December, 2007. [dltj.org] &#160; It never would&#039;ve had a shot at becoming law in the first place when the [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cdn.dltj.org/wp-content/plugins/kramer/kramer.gif" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" />[...]     Bullshit. &nbsp; The open access law that they are threatening to overturn wasn&#8217;t enacted until December, 2007. [dltj.org] &nbsp; It never would&#8217;ve had a shot at becoming law in the first place when the [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: BookBlog: Recent Changes Camp: Media and Science progress toward open content</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/nih-open-access/comment-page-1/#comment-33248</link> <dc:creator>BookBlog: Recent Changes Camp: Media and Science progress toward open content</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 05:35:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2007/12/nih-open-access/#comment-33248</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] in the philosophy of science, shared that the NIH, after years of debate, had mandated that researchers taking NIH money must make their papers available to the public. This decision was ratified into law in December of last year. Since the NIH is a major funder of [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cdn.dltj.org/wp-content/plugins/kramer/kramer.gif" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" />[...] in the philosophy of science, shared that the NIH, after years of debate, had mandated that researchers taking NIH money must make their papers available to the public. This decision was ratified into law in December of last year. Since the NIH is a major funder of [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: OpenCongress - Blog articles for H.R.2764</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/nih-open-access/comment-page-1/#comment-29417</link> <dc:creator>OpenCongress - Blog articles for H.R.2764</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 01:09:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2007/12/nih-open-access/#comment-29417</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] December 19, 2007 NIH Mandatory Open Access Provision Becomes Law [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cdn.dltj.org/wp-content/plugins/kramer/kramer.gif" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" />[...] December 19, 2007 NIH Mandatory Open Access Provision Becomes<br /> Law [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: An open access mandate for the NIH (SPARC)</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/nih-open-access/comment-page-1/#comment-29397</link> <dc:creator>An open access mandate for the NIH (SPARC)</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:09:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2007/12/nih-open-access/#comment-29397</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Peter Murray, NIH Mandatory Open Access Provision Appears Set to Become Law, Disruptive Library Technology Jester, December 19, 2007. http://dltj.org/2007/12/nih-open-access/ [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cdn.dltj.org/wp-content/plugins/kramer/kramer.gif" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" />[...] Peter Murray, NIH Mandatory Open Access Provision Appears Set<br /> to Become Law, Disruptive Library Technology Jester, December 19,<br /> 2007. <a href="http://dltj.org/2007/12/nih-open-access/" rel="nofollow">http://dltj.org/2007/12/nih-open-access/</a> [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Congress Approves Budget Package With Less for&#160;Academe - Chronicle.com</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/nih-open-access/comment-page-1/#comment-29004</link> <dc:creator>Congress Approves Budget Package With Less for&#160;Academe - Chronicle.com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 19:20:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2007/12/nih-open-access/#comment-29004</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] a positive note, the budget package does still include the mandatory deposit and open access provision for NIH-grant-funded articles that was part of the earlier spending [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cdn.dltj.org/wp-content/plugins/kramer/kramer.gif" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" />[...] a positive note, the budget package does still include the<br /> mandatory deposit and open access provision for NIH-grant-funded<br /> articles that was part of the earlier spending [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Peter Suber, SPARC Open Access Newsletter, 1/2/08</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/nih-open-access/comment-page-1/#comment-28915</link> <dc:creator>Peter Suber, SPARC Open Access Newsletter, 1/2/08</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 17:54:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2007/12/nih-open-access/#comment-28915</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cdn.dltj.org/wp-content/plugins/kramer/kramer.gif" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" />[...] [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: dltj.org @ 2012-05-23 15:41:10 by W3 Total Cache -->
