<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	> <channel><title>Comments on: U.S. House Votes to Rescind NDIIPP Funding; Bill Now Under Consideration by Senate</title> <atom:link href="http://dltj.org/article/ndiipp-funding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://dltj.org/article/ndiipp-funding/</link> <description>We&#039;re Disrupted, We&#039;re Librarians, and We&#039;re Not Going to Take It Anymore</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 16:01:37 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Patronizing &#187; Blog Archive &#187; OpenCongress puts a new face on thomas.loc.gov</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/ndiipp-funding/comment-page-1/#comment-12665</link> <dc:creator>Patronizing &#187; Blog Archive &#187; OpenCongress puts a new face on thomas.loc.gov</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 17:38:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2007/02/ndiipp-funding/#comment-12665</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] It looks like a very interesting site; I like the concept. I&#8217;m not sure how long they have been up &#8212; I only found out about the site through a trackback on an article I posted about NDIIPP funding in the recent budget legislation. [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cdn.dltj.org/wp-content/plugins/kramer/kramer.gif" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" />[...] It looks like a very interesting site; I like the concept. I&#8217;m not sure how long they have been up &mdash; I only found out about the site through a trackback on an article I posted about NDIIPP funding in the recent budget legislation. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: OpenCongress - Blog Coverage</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/ndiipp-funding/comment-page-1/#comment-12611</link> <dc:creator>OpenCongress - Blog Coverage</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:14:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2007/02/ndiipp-funding/#comment-12611</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] February 11, 2007 US House Votes to Rescind NDIIPP Funding; Bill Now Under ... [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cdn.dltj.org/wp-content/plugins/kramer/kramer.gif" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" />[...] February 11, 2007 US House Votes to Rescind NDIIPP Funding; Bill Now Under &#8230; [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: DigitalKoans &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Senate Poised to Slash NDIIPP Funding</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/ndiipp-funding/comment-page-1/#comment-12273</link> <dc:creator>DigitalKoans &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Senate Poised to Slash NDIIPP Funding</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:45:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2007/02/ndiipp-funding/#comment-12273</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] The Disruptive Library Technology Jester and Free Range Librarian blogs have sounded a warning that $47 million of unobligated current-year funding for the National Digital Information Infrastructure and Preservation Program is in serious danger of being rescinded. [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cdn.dltj.org/wp-content/plugins/kramer/kramer.gif" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" />[...] The Disruptive Library Technology Jester and Free Range Librarian blogs have sounded a warning that $47 million of unobligated current-year funding for the National Digital Information Infrastructure and Preservation Program is in serious danger of being rescinded. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: the jester</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/ndiipp-funding/comment-page-1/#comment-12270</link> <dc:creator>the jester</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 17:49:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2007/02/ndiipp-funding/#comment-12270</guid> <description>[quote comment=&quot;12269&quot;]Thanks for this Peter. Interesting that it looks like they are pulling support for Voyager too.[/quote]I saw that, too.  What it means for LC&#039;s Voyager implementation may hinge on the definition of &quot;unobligated balances&quot; (doesn&#039;t it always hang on definitions?).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[quote comment="12269"]Thanks for this Peter. Interesting that it looks like they are pulling support for Voyager too.[/quote]</p><p>I saw that, too.  What it means for LC&#8217;s Voyager implementation may hinge on the definition of &#8220;unobligated balances&#8221; (doesn&#8217;t it always hang on definitions?).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ed Summers</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/ndiipp-funding/comment-page-1/#comment-12269</link> <dc:creator>Ed Summers</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 17:40:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2007/02/ndiipp-funding/#comment-12269</guid> <description>Thanks for this Peter. Interesting that it looks like they are pulling support for Voyager too.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this Peter. Interesting that it looks like they are pulling support for Voyager too.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Free Range Librarian &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Your Gummint Nixes Digital Preservation</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/ndiipp-funding/comment-page-1/#comment-18386</link> <dc:creator>Free Range Librarian &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Your Gummint Nixes Digital Preservation</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 13:39:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2007/02/ndiipp-funding/#comment-18386</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] by you and another person who e-mailed me privately, I felt compelled to add my two cents:  U.S. House Votes to Rescind NDIIPP Funding; Bill Now Under Consideration by Senate in Disruptive Library Technology [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cdn.dltj.org/wp-content/plugins/kramer/kramer.gif" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" />[...] by you and another person who e-mailed me privately, I felt compelled to add my two cents:  U.S. House Votes to Rescind NDIIPP Funding; Bill Now Under Consideration by Senate in Disruptive Library Technology [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Disruptive Library Technology Jester :: To: Ohio&#8217;s Senators; Re: Proposed cuts to the NDIIPP</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/ndiipp-funding/comment-page-1/#comment-12244</link> <dc:creator>Disruptive Library Technology Jester :: To: Ohio&#8217;s Senators; Re: Proposed cuts to the NDIIPP</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 03:39:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2007/02/ndiipp-funding/#comment-12244</guid> <description>[...] /Peter E. Murray/  A similar message was sent to Sherrod Brown, Ohio&#8217;s junior senator. See this previous posting on NDIIPP funding for background information. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] /Peter E. Murray/  A similar message was sent to Sherrod Brown, Ohio&#8217;s junior senator. See this previous posting on NDIIPP funding for background information. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: dltj.org @ 2012-05-23 15:32:53 by W3 Total Cache -->
