<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: To:  Ohio&#8217;s Senators; Re: Proposed cuts to the NDIIPP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dltj.org/article/ndiipp-funding-letter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dltj.org/article/ndiipp-funding-letter/</link>
	<description>We&#039;re Disrupted, We&#039;re Librarians, and We&#039;re Not Going to Take It Anymore</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:47:21 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Disruptive Library Technology Jester :: NDIIP Funding Statement by the Librarian of Congress</title>
		<link>http://dltj.org/article/ndiipp-funding-letter/comment-page-1/#comment-13522</link>
		<dc:creator>Disruptive Library Technology Jester :: NDIIP Funding Statement by the Librarian of Congress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 00:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2007/02/ndiipp-funding-letter/#comment-13522</guid>
		<description>[...] Early last month I mentioned what was happening to NDIIP funds with the impending passage of what became Public Law 110-5 [PDF] and posted a copy of a letter I sent to my senators urging them to reconsider the funding rescission. Of course, I wasn&#8217;t the only one who asked congress to reconsider. Strangely (I thought) the Library of Congress has been silent on the topic. Silent until last week, that is. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Early last month I mentioned what was happening to NDIIP funds with the impending passage of what became Public Law 110-5 [PDF] and posted a copy of a letter I sent to my senators urging them to reconsider the funding rescission. Of course, I wasn&#8217;t the only one who asked congress to reconsider. Strangely (I thought) the Library of Congress has been silent on the topic. Silent until last week, that is. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hinkle Library Technical Services Blog: NDIIPP Funding</title>
		<link>http://dltj.org/article/ndiipp-funding-letter/comment-page-1/#comment-12400</link>
		<dc:creator>Hinkle Library Technical Services Blog: NDIIPP Funding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 20:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2007/02/ndiipp-funding-letter/#comment-12400</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] NDIIPP Funding    Bailey has blogged: Senate Poised to Slash NDIIPP FundingThe Disruptive Library Technology Jester and Free Range Librarian blogs have sounded a warning that $47 million of unobligated current-year funding for the National Digital Information Infrastructure and Preservation Program is in serious danger of being rescinded.House Joint Resolution 20 has been passed in the House and is now being considered by the Senate.The NDIIPP 2005 Annual Review provides a detailed look at the work of this important Library of Congress program.See Murray’s Jester posting for the cutback details and check out his protest letter to Ohio’s Senators. [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dev.wp-plugins.org/wiki/Kramer"><img src="http://dltj.org/wp-content/plugins/kramer/kramer.php?kramer=gif-icon" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" /></a>[...] NDIIPP Funding    Bailey has blogged: Senate Poised to Slash NDIIPP FundingThe Disruptive Library Technology Jester and Free Range Librarian blogs have sounded a warning that $47 million of unobligated current-year funding for the National Digital Information Infrastructure and Preservation Program is in serious danger of being rescinded.House Joint Resolution 20 has been passed in the House and is now being considered by the Senate.The NDIIPP 2005 Annual Review provides a detailed look at the work of this important Library of Congress program.See Murray’s Jester posting for the cutback details and check out his protest letter to Ohio’s Senators. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DigitalKoans &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Senate Poised to Slash NDIIPP Funding</title>
		<link>http://dltj.org/article/ndiipp-funding-letter/comment-page-1/#comment-12275</link>
		<dc:creator>DigitalKoans &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Senate Poised to Slash NDIIPP Funding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 20:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2007/02/ndiipp-funding-letter/#comment-12275</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] See Murray&#8217;s Jester posting for the cutback details and check out his protest letter to Ohio&#8217;s Senators. Share and Enjoy:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dev.wp-plugins.org/wiki/Kramer"><img src="http://dltj.org/wp-content/plugins/kramer/kramer.php?kramer=gif-icon" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" /></a>[...] See Murray&#8217;s Jester posting for the cutback details and check out his protest letter to Ohio&#8217;s Senators. Share and Enjoy:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
