<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	> <channel><title>Comments on: To:  Ohio&#8217;s Senators; Re: Proposed cuts to the NDIIPP</title> <atom:link href="http://dltj.org/article/ndiipp-funding-letter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://dltj.org/article/ndiipp-funding-letter/</link> <description>We&#039;re Disrupted, We&#039;re Librarians, and We&#039;re Not Going to Take It Anymore</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 16:01:37 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Disruptive Library Technology Jester :: NDIIP Funding Statement by the Librarian of Congress</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/ndiipp-funding-letter/comment-page-1/#comment-13522</link> <dc:creator>Disruptive Library Technology Jester :: NDIIP Funding Statement by the Librarian of Congress</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 00:56:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2007/02/ndiipp-funding-letter/#comment-13522</guid> <description>[...] Early last month I mentioned what was happening to NDIIP funds with the impending passage of what became Public Law 110-5 [PDF] and posted a copy of a letter I sent to my senators urging them to reconsider the funding rescission. Of course, I wasn&#8217;t the only one who asked congress to reconsider. Strangely (I thought) the Library of Congress has been silent on the topic. Silent until last week, that is. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Early last month I mentioned what was happening to NDIIP funds with the impending passage of what became Public Law 110-5 [PDF] and posted a copy of a letter I sent to my senators urging them to reconsider the funding rescission. Of course, I wasn&#8217;t the only one who asked congress to reconsider. Strangely (I thought) the Library of Congress has been silent on the topic. Silent until last week, that is. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: DigitalKoans &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Senate Poised to Slash NDIIPP Funding</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/ndiipp-funding-letter/comment-page-1/#comment-12275</link> <dc:creator>DigitalKoans &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Senate Poised to Slash NDIIPP Funding</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 20:48:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2007/02/ndiipp-funding-letter/#comment-12275</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] See Murray&#8217;s Jester posting for the cutback details and check out his protest letter to Ohio&#8217;s Senators. Share and Enjoy:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cdn.dltj.org/wp-content/plugins/kramer/kramer.gif" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" />[...] See Murray&#8217;s Jester posting for the cutback details and check out his protest letter to Ohio&#8217;s Senators. Share and Enjoy:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: dltj.org @ 2012-05-23 15:29:50 by W3 Total Cache -->
