The plenary session of JCDL this morning was Jonathan Zittrain (Harvard Law School and University of Oxford) entitled “Open Information: Redaction, Restriction, and Removal.” This was so good that I couldn’t stand to stop and take notes. I did write down one bit: “Libraries are the best hope…for the controlled release of information.” His point was that the library profession is a trusted gatekeeper — librarians have a track record of providing orderly access to shared information resources and taking seriously the responsibility to provide access to those resources under the terms with which they were acquired. (Although there was a great deal of humming in the room at one key point of the presentation — those that were there know what I mean.) Can publishers entrust content to us such that the library controls the DRM that protects the content? Would publishers be willing to give the library the content in an unrestricted form with the promise, in the form of a legal agreement, that the library will apply the appropriate DRM at the appropriate time? Could that be a new role for libraries in this new DRM-happy society?
(This post was updated on 19-Jun-2006.)-
Home
-
Categories
- Blue Sky (8)
- Clayton Christensen (8)
- Disruption in Libraries (49)
- Economies of Scale (13)
- Fedora (36)
- Workflow (2)
- Google Summer of Code (8)
- JPEG2000 (22)
- L/IS Profession (1)
- Library SOA (16)
- Linking Technologies (18)
- Meeting (39)
- Meta Category (34)
- OhioLINK (46)
- DRC (33)
- Personal (4)
- Policy (32)
- Raw Technology (69)
- Sakai (4)
- Textbooks (8)
- Unified Content Repository (23)
Recent Posts
- Google Book Search Settlement: Public Access Service
- Is OCLC’s Change of WorldCat Record Use/Transfer Policy Related to the Google Book Search Agreement?
- Google Book Search Settlement: Reviewing the Notice of Settlement
- George Mason University Issues Statement on Reuters/Zotero Lawsuit
- Google Book Search Settlement: Introduction, Public Announcements
- Looking For a Comprehensive Discovery Layer
Recent Comments
Is OCLC's Change of WorldCat Record Use/Transfer Policy Related to the Google Book Search Agreement?:
- the Jester: @Devanshu -- perhaps, but the question that was answered by…
- Devanshu: It would seem, from OCLC FAQ, that Google Books was…
"Draft Principles for Digitized Content" from the Digitization Policy Task Force of ALA's Office for Information Technology Policy:
- timothy: New with me - MyBlogLog: [...] View Full Profile timothy…
George Mason University Sued by Thomson Reuters over Zotero:
- Do you want faster horses or do you want unicorns? « David F. Flanders: [...] I would agree that the greatest ideas of the…
Out of Print Books Get New Life via Amazon and Participating Libraries:
Colorado Community College System Announces Flat-price Electronic Textbooks from Pearson Education:
Fixing a Mac OSX Leopard Login Loop Caused by Launch Services:
- Mahonri » Blog Archive » Mac Corruption: The Login Loop: [...] I stumbled upon a post on a third party…
- Anmibe: You described my problem with my day-by-day account on MacOS…
jester's comments elsewhere
- 8:59 am "Google/AAP settlement" in Coyle's InFormation
- 11/13/08 "VUFind at PALINET" in Infomotions Mini-Musings
- 11/03/08 "Dear Dan: why is using Flash for navigation a bad idea?" in Coffee|Code
- 11/03/08 "OCLC's proposed new guidelines for the transfer of bibliographic records" in Terry's Worklog
- 11/03/08 "Harvard Library unhappy with Google Books settlement" in Bibliographic Wilderness
- See More »
Archives
Feeds and Such
Copyright





1 Trackback
[...] DRM (Digital Rights Management) at the appropriate time for the appropriate circumstances.) ¶FootnotesThe Chronicle Review, Volume 52, Issue 41, Page B20. [↩]Thanks to teaguese1 for joggingmy memory [↩] [...]
Post a Comment