<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	> <channel><title>Comments on: LC&#8217;s Adoption of Silverlight &#8212; Good Deal for Microsoft, Bad Deal for the Rest of Us</title> <atom:link href="http://dltj.org/article/lc-microsoft-silverlight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://dltj.org/article/lc-microsoft-silverlight/</link> <description>We&#039;re Disrupted, We&#039;re Librarians, and We&#039;re Not Going to Take It Anymore</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:48:39 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Behind the scenes: podium training for men&#8217;s gymnastics in Beijing &#171; Jon Udell</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/lc-microsoft-silverlight/comment-page-1/#comment-33688</link> <dc:creator>Behind the scenes: podium training for men&#8217;s gymnastics in Beijing &#171; Jon Udell</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 19:31:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dltj.org/article/lc-microsoft-silverlight/#comment-33688</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] I vent? I wanted to try out the Silverlight-based video content, despite previous objections, but I&#8217;m part of a minority that is being excluded: Video is currently supported on the [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cdn.dltj.org/wp-content/plugins/kramer/kramer.gif" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" />[...] I vent? I wanted to try out the Silverlight-based video content, despite previous objections, but I&#8217;m part of a minority that is being excluded: Video is currently supported on the [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Microsoft Silverlight &#187; 2008 &#187; March</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/lc-microsoft-silverlight/comment-page-1/#comment-33032</link> <dc:creator>Microsoft Silverlight &#187; 2008 &#187; March</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 09:35:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dltj.org/article/lc-microsoft-silverlight/#comment-33032</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] More:  continued here  [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cdn.dltj.org/wp-content/plugins/kramer/kramer.gif" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" />[...] More:  continued here  [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: darcusblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Brain-Dead Library of Congress Decision</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/lc-microsoft-silverlight/comment-page-1/#comment-32884</link> <dc:creator>darcusblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Brain-Dead Library of Congress Decision</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:28:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dltj.org/article/lc-microsoft-silverlight/#comment-32884</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] the &#8220;WTF&#8221; category, someone please tell me news of the Library of Congress deal with Microsoft to adopt Silverlight is an early April Fool&#8217;s [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cdn.dltj.org/wp-content/plugins/kramer/kramer.gif" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" />[...] the &#8220;WTF&#8221; category, someone please tell me news of the Library of Congress deal with Microsoft to adopt Silverlight is an early April Fool&#8217;s [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: the Jester</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/lc-microsoft-silverlight/comment-page-1/#comment-32883</link> <dc:creator>the Jester</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:04:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dltj.org/article/lc-microsoft-silverlight/#comment-32883</guid> <description>@Dorothea -- there are indeed some very smart folks at LC.  I&#039;ve even had the pleasure of chatting with some of them off-the-record.  If they want to chat on the record, the posting comments are open...@Timothy -- well, and succinctly, put.  Thanks!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dorothea &#8212; there are indeed some very smart folks at LC.  I&#8217;ve even had the pleasure of chatting with some of them off-the-record.  If they want to chat on the record, the posting comments are open&#8230;</p><p>@Timothy &#8212; well, and succinctly, put.  Thanks!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Timothy Parker</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/lc-microsoft-silverlight/comment-page-1/#comment-32882</link> <dc:creator>Timothy Parker</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 22:31:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dltj.org/article/lc-microsoft-silverlight/#comment-32882</guid> <description>Setting aside the Moonlight project for a moment (which is difficult given my suspicion all-things Mono), my primary objection is in the area of good government. How can I as a tax-paying F/OSS user be required to do business with a specific corporation? Thanks for bringing this up again. The whole thing is a bit scandalous.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Setting aside the Moonlight project for a moment (which is difficult given my suspicion all-things Mono), my primary objection is in the area of good government. How can I as a tax-paying F/OSS user be required to do business with a specific corporation?<br /> Thanks for bringing this up again. The whole thing is a bit scandalous.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dorothea Salo</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/lc-microsoft-silverlight/comment-page-1/#comment-32881</link> <dc:creator>Dorothea Salo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 22:00:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dltj.org/article/lc-microsoft-silverlight/#comment-32881</guid> <description>I know the LoC has smart techies. Did said techies just not start soon enough to block this boondoggle? Or do they not work in the right area of LoC? What?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know the LoC has smart techies. Did said techies just not start soon enough to block this boondoggle? Or do they not work in the right area of LoC? What?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: dltj.org @ 2012-02-10 08:03:44 by W3 Total Cache -->
