<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LC&#8217;s Adoption of Silverlight &#8212; Good Deal for Microsoft, Bad Deal for the Rest of Us</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dltj.org/article/lc-microsoft-silverlight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dltj.org/article/lc-microsoft-silverlight/</link>
	<description>We&#039;re Disrupted, We&#039;re Librarians, and We&#039;re Not Going to Take It Anymore</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 08:58:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Behind the scenes: podium training for men&#8217;s gymnastics in Beijing &#171; Jon Udell</title>
		<link>http://dltj.org/article/lc-microsoft-silverlight/comment-page-1/#comment-33688</link>
		<dc:creator>Behind the scenes: podium training for men&#8217;s gymnastics in Beijing &#171; Jon Udell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 19:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dltj.org/article/lc-microsoft-silverlight/#comment-33688</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] I vent? I wanted to try out the Silverlight-based video content, despite previous objections, but I&#8217;m part of a minority that is being excluded: Video is currently supported on the [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dev.wp-plugins.org/wiki/Kramer"><img src="http://dltj.org/wp-content/plugins/kramer/kramer.php?kramer=gif-icon" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" /></a>[...] I vent? I wanted to try out the Silverlight-based video content, despite previous objections, but I&#8217;m part of a minority that is being excluded: Video is currently supported on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reactions</title>
		<link>http://dltj.org/article/lc-microsoft-silverlight/comment-page-1/#comment-33415</link>
		<dc:creator>Reactions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 05:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dltj.org/article/lc-microsoft-silverlight/#comment-33415</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] a March 21, 2008 post,  Disrupted Library Technology Jester suggests that Microsoft is flat-out using the Library of Congress solely to push the adoption of [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dev.wp-plugins.org/wiki/Kramer"><img src="http://dltj.org/wp-content/plugins/kramer/kramer.php?kramer=gif-icon" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" /></a>[...] a March 21, 2008 post,  Disrupted Library Technology Jester suggests that Microsoft is flat-out using the Library of Congress solely to push the adoption of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft Silverlight &#187; 2008 &#187; March</title>
		<link>http://dltj.org/article/lc-microsoft-silverlight/comment-page-1/#comment-33032</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft Silverlight &#187; 2008 &#187; March</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 09:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dltj.org/article/lc-microsoft-silverlight/#comment-33032</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] More:  continued here  [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dev.wp-plugins.org/wiki/Kramer"><img src="http://dltj.org/wp-content/plugins/kramer/kramer.php?kramer=gif-icon" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" /></a>[...] More:  continued here  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darcusblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Brain-Dead Library of Congress Decision</title>
		<link>http://dltj.org/article/lc-microsoft-silverlight/comment-page-1/#comment-32884</link>
		<dc:creator>darcusblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Brain-Dead Library of Congress Decision</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dltj.org/article/lc-microsoft-silverlight/#comment-32884</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] the &#8220;WTF&#8221; category, someone please tell me news of the Library of Congress deal with Microsoft to adopt Silverlight is an early April Fool&#8217;s [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dev.wp-plugins.org/wiki/Kramer"><img src="http://dltj.org/wp-content/plugins/kramer/kramer.php?kramer=gif-icon" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" /></a>[...] the &#8220;WTF&#8221; category, someone please tell me news of the Library of Congress deal with Microsoft to adopt Silverlight is an early April Fool&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the Jester</title>
		<link>http://dltj.org/article/lc-microsoft-silverlight/comment-page-1/#comment-32883</link>
		<dc:creator>the Jester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dltj.org/article/lc-microsoft-silverlight/#comment-32883</guid>
		<description>@Dorothea -- there are indeed some very smart folks at LC.  I&#039;ve even had the pleasure of chatting with some of them off-the-record.  If they want to chat on the record, the posting comments are open...

@Timothy -- well, and succinctly, put.  Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dorothea &#8212; there are indeed some very smart folks at LC.  I&#8217;ve even had the pleasure of chatting with some of them off-the-record.  If they want to chat on the record, the posting comments are open&#8230;</p>
<p>@Timothy &#8212; well, and succinctly, put.  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Parker</title>
		<link>http://dltj.org/article/lc-microsoft-silverlight/comment-page-1/#comment-32882</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 22:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dltj.org/article/lc-microsoft-silverlight/#comment-32882</guid>
		<description>Setting aside the Moonlight project for a moment (which is difficult given my suspicion all-things Mono), my primary objection is in the area of good government. How can I as a tax-paying F/OSS user be required to do business with a specific corporation?
Thanks for bringing this up again. The whole thing is a bit scandalous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Setting aside the Moonlight project for a moment (which is difficult given my suspicion all-things Mono), my primary objection is in the area of good government. How can I as a tax-paying F/OSS user be required to do business with a specific corporation?<br />
Thanks for bringing this up again. The whole thing is a bit scandalous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dorothea Salo</title>
		<link>http://dltj.org/article/lc-microsoft-silverlight/comment-page-1/#comment-32881</link>
		<dc:creator>Dorothea Salo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 22:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://dltj.org/article/lc-microsoft-silverlight/#comment-32881</guid>
		<description>I know the LoC has smart techies. Did said techies just not start soon enough to block this boondoggle? Or do they not work in the right area of LoC? What?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know the LoC has smart techies. Did said techies just not start soon enough to block this boondoggle? Or do they not work in the right area of LoC? What?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
