Comments on: Picking a Java Web Application Framework http://dltj.org/article/java-framework/ We're Disrupted, We're Librarians, and We're Not Going to Take It Anymore Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:48:39 +0000 hourly 1 By: :-: Web Resources and Links for Web Application Framework, Web Application Framework Links, Web Application Framework Books, Web Application Framework Web Resources, Web Application Framework Tools, Web Application Framework Software, Web Application Framhttp://dltj.org/article/java-framework/comment-page-1/#comment-207318 :-: Web Resources and Links for Web Application Framework, Web Application Framework Links, Web Application Framework Books, Web Application Framework Web Resources, Web Application Framework Tools, Web Application Framework Software, Web Application Fram Fri, 13 Jan 2012 03:35:23 +0000 http://dltj.org/2006/10/java-framework/#comment-207318 <!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Picking a Java Web Application Framework - article [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--> Kramer auto Pingback[...] Picking a Java Web Application Framework – article [...]

]]> By: Eric Rowellhttp://dltj.org/article/java-framework/comment-page-1/#comment-159987 Eric Rowell Fri, 07 Jan 2011 10:36:46 +0000 http://dltj.org/2006/10/java-framework/#comment-159987 <span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">A discussion on choosing the best Java Framework http://bit.ly/ftARIB #java</span></span> A discussion on choosing the best Java Framework http://bit.ly/ftARIB #java

]]> By: Peter Murrayhttp://dltj.org/article/java-framework/comment-page-1/#comment-44131 Peter Murray Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:02:45 +0000 http://dltj.org/2006/10/java-framework/#comment-44131 Thank you for the pointer. Different projects have taken me away from Java development at the moment, but I'll keep Hamlets in mind to look at if I'm ever back in that arena. Thank you for the pointer. Different projects have taken me away from Java development at the moment, but I’ll keep Hamlets in mind to look at if I’m ever back in that arena.

]]> By: Prince of Denmarkhttp://dltj.org/article/java-framework/comment-page-1/#comment-44024 Prince of Denmark Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:20:01 +0000 http://dltj.org/2006/10/java-framework/#comment-44024 Have you tried Hamlets?Hamlets (previously known as IBM Servlet-based Content Creation Framework) is an open source system for generating dynamic web-pages developed by René Pawlitzek at IBM. A Hamlet is a servlet extension that reads XHTML template files containing presentation using SAX (the Simple API for XML) and dynamically adds content on the fly to those places in the template which are marked with special tags and IDs using a small set of callback functions. A template compiler can be used to accelerate Hamlets.Hamlets provide an easy-to-use, easy-to-understand, lightweight, small-footprint, servlet-based content creation framework that facilitates the development of Web-based applications. The Hamlets framework not only supports but also enforces the complete separation of content and presentation. It is the result of a radical software simplification effort. Have you tried Hamlets?

Hamlets (previously known as IBM Servlet-based Content Creation Framework) is an open source system for generating dynamic web-pages developed by René Pawlitzek at IBM. A Hamlet is a servlet extension that reads XHTML template files containing presentation using SAX (the Simple API for XML) and dynamically adds content on the fly to those places in the template which are marked with special tags and IDs using a small set of callback functions. A template compiler can be used to accelerate Hamlets.

Hamlets provide an easy-to-use, easy-to-understand, lightweight, small-footprint, servlet-based content creation framework that facilitates the development of Web-based applications. The Hamlets framework not only supports but also enforces the complete separation of content and presentation. It is the result of a radical software simplification effort.

]]> By: Manning Forums: Comparison betweenJboss seam,Spring and ...http://dltj.org/article/java-framework/comment-page-1/#comment-41575 Manning Forums: Comparison betweenJboss seam,Spring and ... Fri, 15 Jan 2010 09:09:41 +0000 http://dltj.org/2006/10/java-framework/#comment-41575 <!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Please referhttp://dltj.org/article/java-framework/ [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--> Kramer auto Pingback[...] Please referhttp://dltj.org/article/java-framework/ [...]

]]> By: Is Struts 2 good? (Struts forum at JavaRanch)http://dltj.org/article/java-framework/comment-page-1/#comment-35929 Is Struts 2 good? (Struts forum at JavaRanch) Tue, 19 May 2009 11:04:53 +0000 http://dltj.org/2006/10/java-framework/#comment-35929 <!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] I've chosen Struts 2 as my web framework. But lately I am seeing many negative comments (Framework Comparison) about Struts. So just wanted to know your thoughts on Struts 2. Is it good or bad? If you are [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--> Kramer auto Pingback[...] I’ve chosen Struts 2 as my web framework. But lately I am seeing many negative comments (Framework Comparison) about Struts. So just wanted to know your thoughts on Struts 2. Is it good or bad? If you are [...]

]]> By: Thomas Whitmorehttp://dltj.org/article/java-framework/comment-page-1/#comment-29623 Thomas Whitmore Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:18:57 +0000 http://dltj.org/2006/10/java-framework/#comment-29623 Spring is the correct choice.. Others are just re-hashing or imitating their old solutions, or what didn't work. Spring does work. Spring+Hibernate+Tomcat is the preferred platform for pretty much *anything*. Add extra tiers and EJBs, if you really *really* need these.. Note that parallel webservers onto database server is already a powerful & scalable, distributed architecture. JFace: why bother? Excessively complex, and overly fix'ed in structure.. As soon as Ajax (AHAX) comes along half the design assumptions become invalid. And a problem. You guys need to fast-forward over the Acronym Bullshit Comprehensibility phase. Most of this technology ain't that good.. no matter how gold- plated the blurb may be. SPRING is actually good. HIBERNATE is actually good. (skip ACEGI for most purposes, though.) If you buy on the acronyms.. you could still be developing two years later, trying to fix said acronyms. Can I sell you a brand-new, little used, EJB-1 with only one lady owner? Spring is the correct choice.. Others are just re-hashing or
imitating their old solutions, or what didn’t work. Spring does
work. Spring+Hibernate+Tomcat is the preferred platform for pretty
much *anything*. Add extra tiers and EJBs, if you really *really*
need these.. Note that parallel webservers onto database server is
already a powerful & scalable, distributed architecture. JFace:
why bother? Excessively complex, and overly fix’ed in structure..
As soon as Ajax (AHAX) comes along half the design assumptions
become invalid. And a problem. You guys need to fast-forward over
the Acronym Bullshit Comprehensibility phase. Most of this
technology ain’t that good.. no matter how gold- plated the blurb
may be. SPRING is actually good. HIBERNATE is actually good. (skip
ACEGI for most purposes, though.) If you buy on the acronyms.. you
could still be developing two years later, trying to fix said
acronyms. Can I sell you a brand-new, little used, EJB-1 with only
one lady owner?

]]> By: steve Mhttp://dltj.org/article/java-framework/comment-page-1/#comment-22553 steve M Wed, 12 Sep 2007 06:26:51 +0000 http://dltj.org/2006/10/java-framework/#comment-22553 Thanks, Despite the title of my original post, I think I agree with your post.Of course Spring framework is a popular but non-standard open source framework and Apache Struts is a free open-source framework for creating Java web applications. http://www.websites-design.com.au/ Thanks, Despite the title of my original post, I think I agree with your post.Of course Spring framework is a popular but non-standard open source framework and Apache Struts is a free open-source framework for creating Java web applications.
http://www.websites-design.com.au/

]]> By: Tech 4D » Blog Archive » Web development frameworkshttp://dltj.org/article/java-framework/comment-page-1/#comment-21596 Tech 4D » Blog Archive » Web development frameworks Tue, 28 Aug 2007 20:04:20 +0000 http://dltj.org/2006/10/java-framework/#comment-21596 [...] A tradeoff analysis of EJB3/JBOSS Seam vs Spring Framework [...] [...] A tradeoff analysis of EJB3/JBOSS Seam vs Spring Framework [...]

]]> By: Disruptive Library Technology Jester :: Looking Forward to Version 2.2 of FEDORAhttp://dltj.org/article/java-framework/comment-page-1/#comment-10194 Disruptive Library Technology Jester :: Looking Forward to Version 2.2 of FEDORA Mon, 01 Jan 2007 01:48:47 +0000 http://dltj.org/2006/10/java-framework/#comment-10194 [...] With release 2.2, the core developers have effectively turned the software distribution inside out. The primary output of the new build process is a standard Web ARchive (or WAR) file that can be put inside any servlet container. The new installation program (see #3 below) comes with a Tomcat distribution, should a new installation need it, but it is no longer required. There have been reports that the new WAR-based distribution works inside the Jetty servlet container; we’re hoping it will work in the JBoss Application Server as well (since that is what we’re using to build our next generation interface). [...] [...] With release 2.2, the core developers have effectively turned the software distribution inside out. The primary output of the new build process is a standard Web ARchive (or WAR) file that can be put inside any servlet container. The new installation program (see #3 below) comes with a Tomcat distribution, should a new installation need it, but it is no longer required. There have been reports that the new WAR-based distribution works inside the Jetty servlet container; we’re hoping it will work in the JBoss Application Server as well (since that is what we’re using to build our next generation interface). [...]

]]>