Comments on: Questioning the Future of JPEG2000 Support in Photoshop http://dltj.org/article/j2k-in-photoshop/ We're Disrupted, We're Librarians, and We're Not Going to Take It Anymore Wed, 23 May 2012 16:01:37 +0000 hourly 1 By: Preservation Matters: Weekly readings - 06 April 2007http://dltj.org/article/j2k-in-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-19474 Preservation Matters: Weekly readings - 06 April 2007 Mon, 23 Jul 2007 01:42:18 +0000 http://dltj.org/2007/04/j2k-in-photoshop/#comment-19474 <!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Questioning the Future of JPEG2000 Support in Photoshop. Peter Murray. TLDJ. April 5, 2007. [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--> Kramer auto Pingback[...] Questioning the Future of JPEG2000 Support in Photoshop. Peter Murray. TLDJ. April 5, 2007. [...]

]]> By: Disruptive Library Technology Jester :: Following Up on Adobe Photoshop and JPEG2000http://dltj.org/article/j2k-in-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-14445 Disruptive Library Technology Jester :: Following Up on Adobe Photoshop and JPEG2000 Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:42:44 +0000 http://dltj.org/2007/04/j2k-in-photoshop/#comment-14445 [...] Nack’s blog posting about the future of JPEG2000 support in Photoshop. Since I last updated my own commentary on the issue, there have been a few more comments, including one by Erich Kesse from the University of Florida. [...] [...] Nack’s blog posting about the future of JPEG2000 support in Photoshop. Since I last updated my own commentary on the issue, there have been a few more comments, including one by Erich Kesse from the University of Florida. [...]

]]> By: Disruptive Library Technology Jester :: JPEG2000 Activity in the Google Summer of Codehttp://dltj.org/article/j2k-in-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-14115 Disruptive Library Technology Jester :: JPEG2000 Activity in the Google Summer of Code Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:27:33 +0000 http://dltj.org/2007/04/j2k-in-photoshop/#comment-14115 [...] by mentors are two that involve J2K. All of this is welcome news, coming in the same month that Adobe is questioning the need for JPEG2000 support in Photoshop. My public gratitude goes out to Google for their third year of offering financial and logistical [...] [...] by mentors are two that involve J2K. All of this is welcome news, coming in the same month that Adobe is questioning the need for JPEG2000 support in Photoshop. My public gratitude goes out to Google for their third year of offering financial and logistical [...]

]]> By: the jesterhttp://dltj.org/article/j2k-in-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-13715 the jester Fri, 06 Apr 2007 00:49:45 +0000 http://dltj.org/2007/04/j2k-in-photoshop/#comment-13715 Roel --Thanks for the comment here, and be sure to register your opinion on <a href="http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2007/04/jpeg_2000_do_yo.html" rel="nofollow">John's blog entry</a> as well! (My own comment seems to be in a holding pattern in his moderation queue.) Roel –

Thanks for the comment here, and be sure to register your opinion on John’s blog entry as well! (My own comment seems to be in a holding pattern in his moderation queue.)

]]> By: Roel Muñozhttp://dltj.org/article/j2k-in-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-13711 Roel Muñoz Thu, 05 Apr 2007 20:54:41 +0000 http://dltj.org/2007/04/j2k-in-photoshop/#comment-13711 We currently use the JPEG2000 plugin regularly. We convert archival TIFF images into working .jpf derivatives for our digital library site (http://diglib.princeton.edu). All of this is done in batch mode using Photoshop--dropping it from future versions significantly would alter our workflow and require a separate program for conversion. Please keep supporting it! We currently use the JPEG2000 plugin regularly. We convert archival TIFF images into working .jpf derivatives for our digital library site (http://diglib.princeton.edu). All of this is done in batch mode using Photoshop–dropping it from future versions significantly would alter our workflow and require a separate program for conversion. Please keep supporting it!

]]>