Comments on: “iTunes U” for Libraries?

By: Scott's eLearning Library » iTunes U

Scott's eLearning Library » iTunes U — Thu, 09 Dec 2010 02:57:50 +0000

[...] are a few whispers of libraries in the USA that are starting to explore iTunes U as a platform for delivering library [...]

By: iTunes U – Are Libraries Missing a Trick? « Scott's Library Blog

iTunes U – Are Libraries Missing a Trick? « Scott's Library Blog — Thu, 20 May 2010 11:19:49 +0000

[...] are a few whispers of libraries in the USA that are starting to explore iTunes U as a platform for delivering library [...]

By: Become a Utah iTunes Library at Utah Libraries

Become a Utah iTunes Library at Utah Libraries — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 01:13:25 +0000

[...] collegiate learning experience. All content would be free without digital rights management. The Disruptive Library Technology Jester at OhioLINK immediately grasped the potential and power of using iTunes as a delivery platform to [...]

By: Lisa Pons-Haitz

Lisa Pons-Haitz — Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:51:55 +0000

I think it’s a great idea. I subscribe to many many podcasts via itunes, but in other places as well. Meeting the students where they are is the biggest point, and itunes will use that. I subscibe to the MIT podcasts, and more.
I would like to even see video podcasts celebrating the collections of our libraries. For example, our digital projects dept has an online exhibit on George Catlin- I think this would make a neat video to be downloaded.

http://digitalprojects.libraries.uc.edu/catlin/index.asp

By: the jester

the jester — Tue, 05 Jun 2007 00:38:00 +0000

[quote comment="17372"]argle frumph grr harrrumph, yeah, as long as iTunes U is not an exclusive arrangement, it’s passable. OK, let me amend, as long as at LEAST one other standards-compliant content equivalent delivery method is used, then okay.[/quote]

Fair enough. We (OhioLINK) have a ways to go on the “at LEAST one other standards-compliant content delivery method” — but there are some versions of an implementation plan that could bring iTunes U and a standards-compliant scheme at the same time…

By: John Fink

John Fink — Mon, 04 Jun 2007 21:43:16 +0000

argle frumph grr harrrumph, yeah, as long as iTunes U is not an exclusive arrangement, it’s passable. OK, let me amend, as long as at LEAST one other standards-compliant content equivalent delivery method is used, then okay.

As for SL, I’m right there with you. I view it as useful for modeling — making walkable buildings or what have you — but for social interaction or what’s typically thought of as library work, I don’t see it really going anywhere.

By: pintiniblog

pintiniblog — Sat, 02 Jun 2007 18:37:38 +0000

[Translation to English via Google] DLTJ se demande si iTunes U ne pourrait pas également être utilisé par les bibs comme plateforme de distribution de contenu (audio, vidéo, …), dans la fameuse et tant espérée perspective de “rencontrer les utilisateurs là où ils se trouvent”…

By: the jester

the jester — Sat, 02 Jun 2007 01:14:15 +0000

I can appreciate your view, John. Since many of my views posted on DLTJ appear to say that I think highly of the open source methodology/ethic, my endorsement of iTunes U could appear to be selling out. (Or seen as supporting my infinitesimal stock interest in Apple, Inc.) In fact, I value a more pragmatic view of getting information to users. Or — to put it into a catch phrase — to meet the users where they are. In this case, a lot of them are in iTunes looking for content to put on their iPod. As long as the arrangement is not exclusive (meaning that an iTunes U agreement would force us to publish some content only in iTunes U) then I think there is a large bang for our buck to be there. Just as I see it is worthwhile to put that same content on the open web in a more standards-oriented manner.

(As a side note, this value explains why I’m interested in, but not excited about, Second Life. Yes, it’s neat and a potentially useful mode to deliver content and services to users. But there simply aren’t enough users there to justify spending the great deal of required to adequately bring our content and services there.)

Does that help clarify my intentions for posting?

By: Eby

Eby — Fri, 01 Jun 2007 15:20:00 +0000

I doubt pmurray was advocating putting all of the stuff in only iTunes. The content is likely already online, but hosting it in iTunes U to make it easier for some to access and use it, or to find a wider audience, sounds like a decent plan to me. Many of the iTunes U areas also link out to the actual sites. For example MIT OpenCourseWare is on iTunes U as well as the web.Putting your library's unique material in as many places as possible to help people find it sounds good to me. I agree with pmurray on this one and he actually beat me to the post.

By: John Fink

John Fink — Fri, 01 Jun 2007 14:21:08 +0000

iTunes U is a terrible idea. A terrible, terrible, terrible idea. Why not use standards? If you want to do podcast-y distribution of material, why not throw up something like a Drupal instance with the Audio module and serve things from there. At least then people will be able to use whatever they want to listen to content. Using iTunes U traps people into using iTunes as a client, and it’s not cross platform.