<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Vision for FEDORA&#8217;s Future, an Implementation Plan to Get There, and a Project Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dltj.org/article/fedora-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dltj.org/article/fedora-update/</link>
	<description>We&#039;re Disrupted, We&#039;re Librarians, and We&#039;re Not Going to Take It Anymore</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 08:58:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Graham Harris</title>
		<link>http://dltj.org/article/fedora-update/comment-page-1/#comment-15832</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 11:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2007/01/fedora-update/#comment-15832</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with you. Booogaloo for standards compliance particularly standards we never heard of. what matters is apps on the desktop. I found this thread because some joker mentioned Clarion, which is a joke except that it&#039;s a hugely- productive software environment, whether you&#039;re a lone independent or a corporate insider: you can build on your own 

Clarion is (perhaps was- when will they ship v7) a fine code generator, with a great set of libraries that delivers apps that behave like proper Windows apps. &quot;like proper Windows apps&quot; is not to endorse Windows, but to recognise that the Windows UI conventions matter a lot: if you want to provide a migration path off Windows, provide apps that do what Windows apps do, with the same keystrokes. 

[quote comment=&quot;11825&quot;]So Sandy Payette gives four major areas where Fedora will shine. What about basic business software, such as accounting?

The problem promoting open source, and Linux in particular, is a complete lack of development tools suitable for the use of an IT person with an AA degree.  We&#039;re talking about something like a Clarion (boy, that dates me) or Access equivalent.  Something that lets casual programmers turn out domain specific applications.

Without that, the open source movement just won&#039;t grow.  With that, the growth will be astronomical.  Joe Programmer writes a department specific application. The department head asks how much does it cost to roll out?  Well, nothing.  We had a spare computer.  It runs Linux.  This app runs under Linux.

As long as open source means one needs a CS degree to piece things together, Linux won&#039;t grow.  In fact Oracle, with the free but (reasonably) limited XE server, has done the most towards this goal of easier application development: database, web server, and environment all in one install image.

I&#039;ve written an open source accounting package: it&#039;s at &lt;a href=&quot;//openaccounting.sourceforge.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;openacounting.sourceforge.net&lt;/a&gt;. Unfortunately it requires Access, which is not open source. What are my options for distributing platform independent, royalty free run times? Other then Oracle XE, I can&#039;t think of any.[/quote]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with you. Booogaloo for standards compliance particularly standards we never heard of. what matters is apps on the desktop. I found this thread because some joker mentioned Clarion, which is a joke except that it&#8217;s a hugely- productive software environment, whether you&#8217;re a lone independent or a corporate insider: you can build on your own </p>
<p>Clarion is (perhaps was- when will they ship v7) a fine code generator, with a great set of libraries that delivers apps that behave like proper Windows apps. &#8220;like proper Windows apps&#8221; is not to endorse Windows, but to recognise that the Windows UI conventions matter a lot: if you want to provide a migration path off Windows, provide apps that do what Windows apps do, with the same keystrokes. </p>
<p>[quote comment="11825"]So Sandy Payette gives four major areas where Fedora will shine. What about basic business software, such as accounting?</p>
<p>The problem promoting open source, and Linux in particular, is a complete lack of development tools suitable for the use of an IT person with an AA degree.  We&#8217;re talking about something like a Clarion (boy, that dates me) or Access equivalent.  Something that lets casual programmers turn out domain specific applications.</p>
<p>Without that, the open source movement just won&#8217;t grow.  With that, the growth will be astronomical.  Joe Programmer writes a department specific application. The department head asks how much does it cost to roll out?  Well, nothing.  We had a spare computer.  It runs Linux.  This app runs under Linux.</p>
<p>As long as open source means one needs a CS degree to piece things together, Linux won&#8217;t grow.  In fact Oracle, with the free but (reasonably) limited XE server, has done the most towards this goal of easier application development: database, web server, and environment all in one install image.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve written an open source accounting package: it&#8217;s at <a href="//openaccounting.sourceforge.net" rel="nofollow">openacounting.sourceforge.net</a>. Unfortunately it requires Access, which is not open source. What are my options for distributing platform independent, royalty free run times? Other then Oracle XE, I can&#8217;t think of any.[/quote]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Road Report: Second Annual Open Repositories Conference (OR07) in San Antonio</title>
		<link>http://dltj.org/article/fedora-update/comment-page-1/#comment-13107</link>
		<dc:creator>Road Report: Second Annual Open Repositories Conference (OR07) in San Antonio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 21:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2007/01/fedora-update/#comment-13107</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Sandy Payette, Co-director of the Fedora project, Cornell, reviewed Fedora 2.2 as an &quot;Open source platform that integrates robust core software with dynamic content access that includes collaborative applications and web access/re-use. It is a technology for complex digital objects. As contrasted with a technology such as Wikipedia&#039;s MediaWiki &#150;ideal for working with wiki-based resources &#150; FEDORA is great for many different applications, including as a content store for wikis. In other words, one is not tied to one particular application or use case.&quot;1 She also presented an overview of a new FEDORA Commons,2 which will provide a non-profit organizational home to support core software development and the growing Fedora community. Download software here. [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dev.wp-plugins.org/wiki/Kramer"><img src="http://dltj.org/wp-content/plugins/kramer/kramer.php?kramer=gif-icon" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" /></a>[...] Sandy Payette, Co-director of the Fedora project, Cornell, reviewed Fedora 2.2 as an &#8220;Open source platform that integrates robust core software with dynamic content access that includes collaborative applications and web access/re-use. It is a technology for complex digital objects. As contrasted with a technology such as Wikipedia&#8217;s MediaWiki &#8211;ideal for working with wiki-based resources &#8211; FEDORA is great for many different applications, including as a content store for wikis. In other words, one is not tied to one particular application or use case.&#8221;1 She also presented an overview of a new FEDORA Commons,2 which will provide a non-profit organizational home to support core software development and the growing Fedora community. Download software here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Main Page - FedoraWiki</title>
		<link>http://dltj.org/article/fedora-update/comment-page-1/#comment-12058</link>
		<dc:creator>Main Page - FedoraWiki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 00:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2007/01/fedora-update/#comment-12058</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...]  Payette, A Vision for Fedora’s Future, An Implementation Plan to Get There, and A Project Update [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dev.wp-plugins.org/wiki/Kramer"><img src="http://dltj.org/wp-content/plugins/kramer/kramer.php?kramer=gif-icon" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" /></a>[...]  Payette, A Vision for Fedora’s Future, An Implementation Plan to Get There, and A Project Update [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NSDL Road Reports &#187; Blog Archive &#187; NSDL Presentations at Open Repositories 2007</title>
		<link>http://dltj.org/article/fedora-update/comment-page-1/#comment-11959</link>
		<dc:creator>NSDL Road Reports &#187; Blog Archive &#187; NSDL Presentations at Open Repositories 2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 19:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2007/01/fedora-update/#comment-11959</guid>
		<description>[...] Payette, A Vision for Fedora’s Future, An Implementation Plan to Get There, and A Project Update http://dltj.org/2007/01/fedora-update/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Payette, A Vision for Fedora’s Future, An Implementation Plan to Get There, and A Project Update <a href="http://dltj.org/2007/01/fedora-update/" rel="nofollow">http://dltj.org/2007/01/fedora-update/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Open Repositories 2007 - IU Digital Library Program Confluence</title>
		<link>http://dltj.org/article/fedora-update/comment-page-1/#comment-11956</link>
		<dc:creator>Open Repositories 2007 - IU Digital Library Program Confluence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 19:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2007/01/fedora-update/#comment-11956</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] The big news is that Fedora will be moving out of Virginia/Cornell, and into the Fedora Commons Foundation. For more details, see the Jester&#039;s blog entry on Sandy Payette&#039;s plenary talk. [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dev.wp-plugins.org/wiki/Kramer"><img src="http://dltj.org/wp-content/plugins/kramer/kramer.php?kramer=gif-icon" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" /></a>[...] The big news is that Fedora will be moving out of Virginia/Cornell, and into the Fedora Commons Foundation. For more details, see the Jester&#8217;s blog entry on Sandy Payette&#8217;s plenary talk. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NSDL Road Reports &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Highlights of Kaye Howe&#8217;s Address at the Second International Open Repositories Conference</title>
		<link>http://dltj.org/article/fedora-update/comment-page-1/#comment-11895</link>
		<dc:creator>NSDL Road Reports &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Highlights of Kaye Howe&#8217;s Address at the Second International Open Repositories Conference</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 20:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2007/01/fedora-update/#comment-11895</guid>
		<description>[...] In a keynote address to the Fedora Users Group at the Second International Open Repositories Conference entitled, &#8220;&#8221;Risk, What Risk: Choosing Fedora for the National Science Digital Library&#8221; Kaye Howe, Executive Director for NSDL&#8217;s Core Integration project began her remarks with humor and candor. She asked if everyone could see what she referred to as &#8220;the last legal pad&#8221; where, she assured attendees, she would be sketching visual aides. She set a near perfect counterpoint tone to Sandy Payette&#8217;s sweeping organizational and technical presentation with a cautionary quote from T.S. Eliot: &#8220;We had the experience, but missed the meaning.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In a keynote address to the Fedora Users Group at the Second International Open Repositories Conference entitled, &#8220;&#8221;Risk, What Risk: Choosing Fedora for the National Science Digital Library&#8221; Kaye Howe, Executive Director for NSDL&#8217;s Core Integration project began her remarks with humor and candor. She asked if everyone could see what she referred to as &#8220;the last legal pad&#8221; where, she assured attendees, she would be sketching visual aides. She set a near perfect counterpoint tone to Sandy Payette&#8217;s sweeping organizational and technical presentation with a cautionary quote from T.S. Eliot: &#8220;We had the experience, but missed the meaning.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the jester</title>
		<link>http://dltj.org/article/fedora-update/comment-page-1/#comment-11839</link>
		<dc:creator>the jester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 02:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2007/01/fedora-update/#comment-11839</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;11825&quot;]So Sandy Payette gives four major areas where Fedora will shine. What about basic business software, such as accounting?[/quote]

I think you have mistaken Fedora, the flexible extensible digital object repository architecture (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fedora.info/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.fedora.info&lt;/a&gt;), with Fedora, the operating system (&lt;a href=&quot;http://fedora.redhat.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;fedora.redhat.com&lt;/a&gt;).    If I have misread your comment, please write back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[quote comment="11825"]So Sandy Payette gives four major areas where Fedora will shine. What about basic business software, such as accounting?[/quote]</p>
<p>I think you have mistaken Fedora, the flexible extensible digital object repository architecture (<a href="http://www.fedora.info/" rel="nofollow">http://www.fedora.info</a>), with Fedora, the operating system (<a href="http://fedora.redhat.com/" rel="nofollow">fedora.redhat.com</a>).    If I have misread your comment, please write back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Paul Kazarian</title>
		<link>http://dltj.org/article/fedora-update/comment-page-1/#comment-11825</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Paul Kazarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 16:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2007/01/fedora-update/#comment-11825</guid>
		<description>So Sandy Payette gives four major areas where Fedora will shine. What about basic business software, such as accounting?

The problem promoting open source, and Linux in particular, is a complete lack of development tools suitable for the use of an IT person with an AA degree.  We&#039;re talking about something like a Clarion (boy, that dates me) or Access equivalent.  Something that lets casual programmers turn out domain specific applications.

Without that, the open source movement just won&#039;t grow.  With that, the growth will be astronomical.  Joe Programmer writes a department specific application. The department head asks how much does it cost to roll out?  Well, nothing.  We had a spare computer.  It runs Linux.  This app runs under Linux.

As long as open source means one needs a CS degree to piece things together, Linux won&#039;t grow.  In fact Oracle, with the free but (reasonably) limited XE server, has done the most towards this goal of easier application development: database, web server, and environment all in one install image.

I&#039;ve written an open source accounting package: it&#039;s at &lt;a href=&quot;http://openaccounting.sourceforge.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;openacounting.sourceforge.net&lt;/a&gt;. Unfortunately it requires Access, which is not open source. What are my options for distributing platform independent, royalty free run times? Other then Oracle XE, I can&#039;t think of any.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Sandy Payette gives four major areas where Fedora will shine. What about basic business software, such as accounting?</p>
<p>The problem promoting open source, and Linux in particular, is a complete lack of development tools suitable for the use of an IT person with an AA degree.  We&#8217;re talking about something like a Clarion (boy, that dates me) or Access equivalent.  Something that lets casual programmers turn out domain specific applications.</p>
<p>Without that, the open source movement just won&#8217;t grow.  With that, the growth will be astronomical.  Joe Programmer writes a department specific application. The department head asks how much does it cost to roll out?  Well, nothing.  We had a spare computer.  It runs Linux.  This app runs under Linux.</p>
<p>As long as open source means one needs a CS degree to piece things together, Linux won&#8217;t grow.  In fact Oracle, with the free but (reasonably) limited XE server, has done the most towards this goal of easier application development: database, web server, and environment all in one install image.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve written an open source accounting package: it&#8217;s at <a href="http://openaccounting.sourceforge.net" rel="nofollow">openacounting.sourceforge.net</a>. Unfortunately it requires Access, which is not open source. What are my options for distributing platform independent, royalty free run times? Other then Oracle XE, I can&#8217;t think of any.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LoomWare</title>
		<link>http://dltj.org/article/fedora-update/comment-page-1/#comment-11823</link>
		<dc:creator>LoomWare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 15:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2007/01/fedora-update/#comment-11823</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Fedora a Better Repository Alternative?...&lt;/strong&gt;

A Vision for FEDORAs Future The Fedora Project recently released version 2.2 of their Fedora repository system and Peter Murray provides a nice summary based on a presentation by Sandy Payette, Fedora co-director. I have been thinking about this stuff...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Fedora a Better Repository Alternative?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>A Vision for FEDORAs Future The Fedora Project recently released version 2.2 of their Fedora repository system and Peter Murray provides a nice summary based on a presentation by Sandy Payette, Fedora co-director. I have been thinking about this stuff&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blogs &#124; EDUCAUSE CONNECT</title>
		<link>http://dltj.org/article/fedora-update/comment-page-1/#comment-11801</link>
		<dc:creator>blogs &#124; EDUCAUSE CONNECT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 13:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2007/01/fedora-update/#comment-11801</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;that has already spurred the next round of Microsoft jokes, the Redmond giant has filed a patent application for a technology for &quot;immortal&quot; data storage, allowing information to be saved for eons, even if the hard disk goes the way of the palimpsest.&quot;A Vision for FEDORA&#039;s Future, an Implementation Plan to Get There, and a Project Update&quot; This morning, Sandy Payette of Cornell University and FEDORA project co-director, gave an update on the FEDORA project including a statement of a vision for FEDORA&#039;s future, information about the emerging FEDORA Commons non-profit, and a status&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="technorati-balloon" href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?url=http://dltj.org/article/fedora-update/"><img src="http://static.technorati.com/images/bubble_h17.gif" class="technorati-balloon" alt="links from Technorati" style="border:0;" /></a>that has already spurred the next round of Microsoft jokes, the Redmond giant has filed a patent application for a technology for &#8220;immortal&#8221; data storage, allowing information to be saved for eons, even if the hard disk goes the way of the palimpsest.&#8221;A Vision for FEDORA&#8217;s Future, an Implementation Plan to Get There, and a Project Update&#8221; This morning, Sandy Payette of Cornell University and FEDORA project co-director, gave an update on the FEDORA project including a statement of a vision for FEDORA&#8217;s future, information about the emerging FEDORA Commons non-profit, and a status</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
