<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	> <channel><title>Comments on: Seeking a Tag for /The/ FEDORA</title> <atom:link href="http://dltj.org/article/fedora-tag/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://dltj.org/article/fedora-tag/</link> <description>We&#039;re Disrupted, We&#039;re Librarians, and We&#039;re Not Going to Take It Anymore</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:48:39 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Michael</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/fedora-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-115</link> <dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 19:15:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2006/05/fedora-tag/#comment-115</guid> <description>I share Peter&#039;s concerns about tag conjunction and I really appreciate the simplicity of having just the one tag.  Even in a two-tag world, &quot;fedora&quot; and &quot;repository&quot; still doesn&#039;t quite disambiguate our Fedora from the other Fedora -- there will be links tagged with both that point at repositories containing the fedora-linux code, or software for it.  Or repositories, used in the most general sense, installed atop fedora-linux.We can, of course, have our cake and eat it too by tagging with &quot;fedora&quot; for moral satisfaction -and- &quot;fedora-dr&quot; for the simple discovery we seek.Our Fedora deserves its own tag, in my humble opinion, and it&#039;s unlikely to think that it will own the rights to that name any time soon.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I share Peter&#8217;s concerns about tag conjunction and I really appreciate the simplicity of having just the one tag.  Even in a two-tag world, &#8220;fedora&#8221; and &#8220;repository&#8221; still doesn&#8217;t quite disambiguate our Fedora from the other Fedora &#8212; there will be links tagged with both that point at repositories containing the fedora-linux code, or software for it.  Or repositories, used in the most general sense, installed atop fedora-linux.</p><p>We can, of course, have our cake and eat it too by tagging with &#8220;fedora&#8221; for moral satisfaction -and- &#8220;fedora-dr&#8221; for the simple discovery we seek.</p><p>Our Fedora deserves its own tag, in my humble opinion, and it&#8217;s unlikely to think that it will own the rights to that name any time soon.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: the jester</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/fedora-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-107</link> <dc:creator>the jester</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 16:14:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2006/05/fedora-tag/#comment-107</guid> <description>Do most engines allow you to perform an AND with multiple tags?  I&#039;m not sure that is possible with Technorati...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do most engines allow you to perform an AND with multiple tags?  I&#8217;m not sure that is possible with Technorati&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Brian Vargas</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/fedora-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-100</link> <dc:creator>Brian Vargas</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 14:27:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2006/05/fedora-tag/#comment-100</guid> <description>Perhaps a better approach would be to simply tag it with &quot;fedora&quot; but always make sure we include an additional tag that differentiates it from the purloined version from Redhat.  Maybe just throw in a &quot;repository&quot; tag.It feels to me like a moral retreat if we modify a chosen tag name in deference to the majority.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps a better approach would be to simply tag it with &#8220;fedora&#8221; but always make sure we include an additional tag that differentiates it from the purloined version from Redhat.  Maybe just throw in a &#8220;repository&#8221; tag.</p><p>It feels to me like a moral retreat if we modify a chosen tag name in deference to the majority.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Michael</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/fedora-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-93</link> <dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 06:06:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2006/05/fedora-tag/#comment-93</guid> <description>I appreciate the Repo Man reference. :)  The visual of Carl and Thorny is &lt;i&gt;priceless&lt;/i&gt;.  Photoshop it and include it in a talk at the Fedora conference. ;)So it&#039;s down to fedora-dr and fedora-repo, currently?I wonder if this warrants discussion on the fedora-users mailing list.Keep fightin&#039; the good fight, soldier, and I&#039;ll do the same.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate the Repo Man reference. <img src='http://cdn.dltj.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> The visual of Carl and Thorny is <i>priceless</i>.  Photoshop it and include it in a talk at the Fedora conference. <img src='http://cdn.dltj.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p>So it&#8217;s down to fedora-dr and fedora-repo, currently?</p><p>I wonder if this warrants discussion on the fedora-users mailing list.</p><p>Keep fightin&#8217; the good fight, soldier, and I&#8217;ll do the same.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: the jester</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/fedora-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-90</link> <dc:creator>the jester</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 23:57:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2006/05/fedora-tag/#comment-90</guid> <description>Give it time -- the others will see the light soon.  :-)The talk on the #fedora-users IRC channel this afternoon favored &quot;fedora-repo&quot; despite the visualizations of a large Chevy Malibu filled with a trunk of 9-track tapes. Don&#039;t get the reference?  See the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0087995/plotsummary&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;IMDB entry for the 1984 movie &lt;i&gt;Repo Man&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.  (Somehow I can visualize Carl and Thorny driving said Chevy Malibu...)  I must admit, though, that I like &quot;fedora-dr&quot; better than &quot;fedora.info&quot; &lt;i&gt;or&lt;/i&gt; &quot;fedora-info&quot; at this point.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Give it time &#8212; the others will see the light soon. <img src='http://cdn.dltj.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p>The talk on the #fedora-users IRC channel this afternoon favored &#8220;fedora-repo&#8221; despite the visualizations of a large Chevy Malibu filled with a trunk of 9-track tapes. Don&#8217;t get the reference?  See the <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0087995/plotsummary" rel="nofollow">IMDB entry for the 1984 movie <i>Repo Man</i></a>.  (Somehow I can visualize Carl and Thorny driving said Chevy Malibu&#8230;)  I must admit, though, that I like &#8220;fedora-dr&#8221; better than &#8220;fedora.info&#8221; <i>or</i> &#8220;fedora-info&#8221; at this point.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Michael</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/fedora-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-89</link> <dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 23:42:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2006/05/fedora-tag/#comment-89</guid> <description>&lt;i&gt;it is unlikely that at the moment our use of the ‘fedora’ tag by itself would be drown out by its usage for a certain flavor of the Linux operating system&lt;/i&gt;As someone who&#039;s subscribed to the &quot;fedora&quot; tag on del.icio.us, I would beg to differ!  Behold -- http://del.icio.us/tag/fedoraHow about fedora-dr (digital repository)?  It&#039;s simple, short, and doesn&#039;t misrepresent Fedora as something its not.I like that fedora-info refers to the official Fedora website, but it&#039;s not obvious that the &quot;-&quot; is indicative of a &quot;.&quot; which may or may not be tag-friendly.  If &quot;.&quot; is tag friendly, I think &quot;fedora.info&quot; is an obvious and good choice for us.  Otherwise, I&#039;m leaning a bit towards fedora-dr.Back to you. :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>it is unlikely that at the moment our use of the ‘fedora’ tag by itself would be drown out by its usage for a certain flavor of the Linux operating system</i></p><p>As someone who&#8217;s subscribed to the &#8220;fedora&#8221; tag on del.icio.us, I would beg to differ!  Behold &#8212; <a href="http://del.icio.us/tag/fedora" rel="nofollow">http://del.icio.us/tag/fedora</a></p><p>How about fedora-dr (digital repository)?  It&#8217;s simple, short, and doesn&#8217;t misrepresent Fedora as something its not.</p><p>I like that fedora-info refers to the official Fedora website, but it&#8217;s not obvious that the &#8220;-&#8221; is indicative of a &#8220;.&#8221; which may or may not be tag-friendly.  If &#8220;.&#8221; is tag friendly, I think &#8220;fedora.info&#8221; is an obvious and good choice for us.  Otherwise, I&#8217;m leaning a bit towards fedora-dr.</p><p>Back to you. <img src='http://cdn.dltj.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: dltj.org @ 2012-02-11 12:30:43 by W3 Total Cache -->
