<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	> <channel><title>Comments on: Fedora Disseminators to Enable Accessible Repository Content</title> <atom:link href="http://dltj.org/article/fedora-disseminators-for-accessibility/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://dltj.org/article/fedora-disseminators-for-accessibility/</link> <description>We&#039;re Disrupted, We&#039;re Librarians, and We&#039;re Not Going to Take It Anymore</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:48:39 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Walt at Random &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Printability: It&#8217;s not just for Firefox anymore</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/fedora-disseminators-for-accessibility/comment-page-1/#comment-10832</link> <dc:creator>Walt at Random &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Printability: It&#8217;s not just for Firefox anymore</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:22:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2006/05/fedora-disseminators-for-accessibility/#comment-10832</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] I tried your site and was pleased to find a nice print media CSS declaration. (Or, in the case of WaR, I think what is happening when the page is printed is the absence of a CSS declaration because you are using media=&#8221;screen&#8221; attribute.) How your page appears when printed (and given your typography interest, this comes as no surprise to you) is very important. I worked for a number of hours to make sure it came out right on DLTJ as well. Try printing a random posting on DLTJ and you&#8217;ll see what I mean. [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cdn.dltj.org/wp-content/plugins/kramer/kramer.gif" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" />[...] I tried your site and was pleased to find a nice print media CSS declaration. (Or, in the case of WaR, I think what is happening when the page is printed is the absence of a CSS declaration because you are using media=&#8221;screen&#8221; attribute.) How your page appears when printed (and given your typography interest, this comes as no surprise to you) is very important. I worked for a number of hours to make sure it came out right on DLTJ as well. Try printing a random posting on DLTJ and you&#8217;ll see what I mean. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: the jester</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/fedora-disseminators-for-accessibility/comment-page-1/#comment-83</link> <dc:creator>the jester</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 00:54:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2006/05/fedora-disseminators-for-accessibility/#comment-83</guid> <description>I don&#039;t know of anyone else the blogs, but there are some that are reading this blog and some others that hang out on the IRC channel.  I&#039;ll try posting a message here specifically on the topic (to catch those that are not reading the comments) and query the IRC channel participants tomorrow.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know of anyone else the blogs, but there are some that are reading this blog and some others that hang out on the IRC channel.  I&#8217;ll try posting a message here specifically on the topic (to catch those that are not reading the comments) and query the IRC channel participants tomorrow.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Michael</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/fedora-disseminators-for-accessibility/comment-page-1/#comment-81</link> <dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 22:39:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2006/05/fedora-disseminators-for-accessibility/#comment-81</guid> <description>It&#039;s a tough one, isn&#039;t it?I think I&#039;m leaning towards fedora-repository or fedorarepository, though both are terribly long.  The popular tags for fedora.info at del.icio.us aren&#039;t terribly great, either.Do you know any other Fedora bloggers who might have suggestions?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a tough one, isn&#8217;t it?</p><p>I think I&#8217;m leaning towards fedora-repository or fedorarepository, though both are terribly long.  The popular tags for fedora.info at del.icio.us aren&#8217;t terribly great, either.</p><p>Do you know any other Fedora bloggers who might have suggestions?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: the jester</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/fedora-disseminators-for-accessibility/comment-page-1/#comment-75</link> <dc:creator>the jester</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 14 May 2006 02:05:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2006/05/fedora-disseminators-for-accessibility/#comment-75</guid> <description>Hmmm -- if it was case sensitive, we could call it FEDORA.  :-)Good question, though.  &quot;The-Fedora&quot;?  &quot;Fedora-DOR&quot;?  Should we refer to it by the domain name (&quot;fedora-info&quot; -- I&#039;m not sure if &quot;fedora.info&quot; is legal in many cases)?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm &#8212; if it was case sensitive, we could call it FEDORA. <img src='http://cdn.dltj.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p>Good question, though.  &#8220;The-Fedora&#8221;?  &#8220;Fedora-DOR&#8221;?  Should we refer to it by the domain name (&#8220;fedora-info&#8221; &#8212; I&#8217;m not sure if &#8220;fedora.info&#8221; is legal in many cases)?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Michael</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/fedora-disseminators-for-accessibility/comment-page-1/#comment-72</link> <dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2006 04:46:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2006/05/fedora-disseminators-for-accessibility/#comment-72</guid> <description>Hey Peter,Since Red Hat doesn&#039;t seem likely to give up on the name &quot;Fedora,&quot; and it&#039;d be nice to have a tag for our Fedora that doesn&#039;t bring up a bunch of articles about the Linux kernel, I was thinking it&#039;d be good for us Fedora bloggers to come up with a tag solely for our Fedora.  Then we can make smarter searches on technorati, del.icio.us, and so forth.I&#039;m thinking something along the lines of &quot;fedora-repository&quot; currently, but that&#039;s not too spectacular.  Any ideas?  If we come up with a tag before the Fedora conference, it can even be shared with other potential Fedora bloggers.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Peter,</p><p>Since Red Hat doesn&#8217;t seem likely to give up on the name &#8220;Fedora,&#8221; and it&#8217;d be nice to have a tag for our Fedora that doesn&#8217;t bring up a bunch of articles about the Linux kernel, I was thinking it&#8217;d be good for us Fedora bloggers to come up with a tag solely for our Fedora.  Then we can make smarter searches on technorati, del.icio.us, and so forth.</p><p>I&#8217;m thinking something along the lines of &#8220;fedora-repository&#8221; currently, but that&#8217;s not too spectacular.  Any ideas?  If we come up with a tag before the Fedora conference, it can even be shared with other potential Fedora bloggers.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Michael</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/fedora-disseminators-for-accessibility/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link> <dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 06 May 2006 04:27:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2006/05/fedora-disseminators-for-accessibility/#comment-61</guid> <description>Yet another advantage borne of the flexibility of Fedora!  You&#039;re on a roll, Peter.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet another advantage borne of the flexibility of Fedora!  You&#8217;re on a roll, Peter.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: dltj.org @ 2012-02-11 17:47:20 by W3 Total Cache -->
