<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EBSCO in Cahoots With Harvard Business Press</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dltj.org/article/ebsco-hbp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dltj.org/article/ebsco-hbp/</link>
	<description>We&#039;re Disrupted, We&#039;re Librarians, and We&#039;re Not Going to Take It Anymore</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 08:58:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Has EBSCO become the new evil empire? &#124; Information Wants To Be Free</title>
		<link>http://dltj.org/article/ebsco-hbp/comment-page-1/#comment-77240</link>
		<dc:creator>Has EBSCO become the new evil empire? &#124; Information Wants To Be Free</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 17:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/?p=1072#comment-77240</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] was less than thrilled with the way EBSCO has dealt with some of its customers vis-à-vis Harvard Business Review. I thought it was pretty evil that they signed exclusive deals for all of those Time, Inc. [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dev.wp-plugins.org/wiki/Kramer"><img src="http://dltj.org/wp-content/plugins/kramer/kramer.php?kramer=gif-icon" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" /></a>[...] was less than thrilled with the way EBSCO has dealt with some of its customers vis-à-vis Harvard Business Review. I thought it was pretty evil that they signed exclusive deals for all of those Time, Inc. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: So Big It Fails &#124; Peer to Peer Review - 4/8/2010 - Library Journal</title>
		<link>http://dltj.org/article/ebsco-hbp/comment-page-1/#comment-63720</link>
		<dc:creator>So Big It Fails &#124; Peer to Peer Review - 4/8/2010 - Library Journal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 20:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/?p=1072#comment-63720</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] was provoked to criticize EBSCO because, after a series of unfortunate events, her Rubicon was crossed: a scholarly society that publishes a journal [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dev.wp-plugins.org/wiki/Kramer"><img src="http://dltj.org/wp-content/plugins/kramer/kramer.php?kramer=gif-icon" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" /></a>[...] was provoked to criticize EBSCO because, after a series of unfortunate events, her Rubicon was crossed: a scholarly society that publishes a journal [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HSLIC Web Advisory Committee: Has EBSCO become the new evil empire?</title>
		<link>http://dltj.org/article/ebsco-hbp/comment-page-1/#comment-62873</link>
		<dc:creator>HSLIC Web Advisory Committee: Has EBSCO become the new evil empire?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 13:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/?p=1072#comment-62873</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...]  Has EBSCO become the new evil empire?: &quot;Absolutely.I was less than thrilled with the way EBSCO has dealt with some of its customers vis-à-vis Harvard Business Review. I thought it was pretty evil that they signed exclusive deals for all of those Time, Inc. [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dev.wp-plugins.org/wiki/Kramer"><img src="http://dltj.org/wp-content/plugins/kramer/kramer.php?kramer=gif-icon" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" /></a>[...]  Has EBSCO become the new evil empire?: &quot;Absolutely.I was less than thrilled with the way EBSCO has dealt with some of its customers vis-à-vis Harvard Business Review. I thought it was pretty evil that they signed exclusive deals for all of those Time, Inc. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cognitive dissonance : The Book of Trogool</title>
		<link>http://dltj.org/article/ebsco-hbp/comment-page-1/#comment-50056</link>
		<dc:creator>Cognitive dissonance : The Book of Trogool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 22:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/?p=1072#comment-50056</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] is the same school that plays horrendous anti-library, anti-education games with their flagship Harvard Business [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dev.wp-plugins.org/wiki/Kramer"><img src="http://dltj.org/wp-content/plugins/kramer/kramer.php?kramer=gif-icon" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" /></a>[...] is the same school that plays horrendous anti-library, anti-education games with their flagship Harvard Business [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harvard Business School open access policy &#171; Bibliographic Wilderness</title>
		<link>http://dltj.org/article/ebsco-hbp/comment-page-1/#comment-50031</link>
		<dc:creator>Harvard Business School open access policy &#171; Bibliographic Wilderness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 21:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/?p=1072#comment-50031</guid>
		<description>[...] (and especially HBR Case Studies) are known to be some of (the) (strictest) (publishers) (around) when it comes to controlling their intellectual property. They [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (and especially HBR Case Studies) are known to be some of (the) (strictest) (publishers) (around) when it comes to controlling their intellectual property. They [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gale: An open letter to the library community - LSW - FriendFeed</title>
		<link>http://dltj.org/article/ebsco-hbp/comment-page-1/#comment-42050</link>
		<dc:creator>Gale: An open letter to the library community - LSW - FriendFeed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 22:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/?p=1072#comment-42050</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] - D0r0th34      After last year&#039;s Harvard Business Review/EBSCO thing, I&#039;ve got no love for EBSCO. http://dltj.org/article... - Stephen Francoeur      oh, me neither -- let &#039;em fry. but I feel that way about MOST purveyors of [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dev.wp-plugins.org/wiki/Kramer"><img src="http://dltj.org/wp-content/plugins/kramer/kramer.php?kramer=gif-icon" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" /></a>[...] &#8211; D0r0th34      After last year&#39;s Harvard Business Review/EBSCO thing, I&#39;ve got no love for EBSCO. <a href="http://dltj.org/article.." rel="nofollow">http://dltj.org/article..</a>. &#8211; Stephen Francoeur      oh, me neither &#8212; let &#39;em fry. but I feel that way about MOST purveyors of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; EBSCO&#8217;s Exclusive Content Deals Reference at Newman Library</title>
		<link>http://dltj.org/article/ebsco-hbp/comment-page-1/#comment-42041</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; EBSCO&#8217;s Exclusive Content Deals Reference at Newman Library</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 19:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/?p=1072#comment-42041</guid>
		<description>[...] It is worth remembering here the exclusive deal that Harvard Business Review had struck with EBSCO that prevents EBSCO customers from creating stable URLs to records for HBR articles. For details on that, read Paul Pival&#8217;s posts on his Distant Library blog and Peter Murray&#8217;s post on his Distributed Library Technology Jester blog. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It is worth remembering here the exclusive deal that Harvard Business Review had struck with EBSCO that prevents EBSCO customers from creating stable URLs to records for HBR articles. For details on that, read Paul Pival&#8217;s posts on his Distant Library blog and Peter Murray&#8217;s post on his Distributed Library Technology Jester blog. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Copyright Hall of Janus? : Harvard University&#8217;s Two-Faced Approach to Copyright &#171; The Learned Fangirl</title>
		<link>http://dltj.org/article/ebsco-hbp/comment-page-1/#comment-37987</link>
		<dc:creator>Copyright Hall of Janus? : Harvard University&#8217;s Two-Faced Approach to Copyright &#171; The Learned Fangirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 02:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/?p=1072#comment-37987</guid>
		<description>[...] was reminded of the practical difficulty of working within this policy, based on the EBSCO database forbidding deep linking directly to specific [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was reminded of the practical difficulty of working within this policy, based on the EBSCO database forbidding deep linking directly to specific [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Copyright Advisory Network &#187; Copyright Hall of Janus? : Harvard University&#8217;s Two-Faced Approach to Copyright</title>
		<link>http://dltj.org/article/ebsco-hbp/comment-page-1/#comment-37986</link>
		<dc:creator>Copyright Advisory Network &#187; Copyright Hall of Janus? : Harvard University&#8217;s Two-Faced Approach to Copyright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 02:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/?p=1072#comment-37986</guid>
		<description>[...] was reminded of the practical difficulty of working within this policy, based on the EBSCO database forbidding deep linking directly to specific [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was reminded of the practical difficulty of working within this policy, based on the EBSCO database forbidding deep linking directly to specific [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the Jester</title>
		<link>http://dltj.org/article/ebsco-hbp/comment-page-1/#comment-37370</link>
		<dc:creator>the Jester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 01:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/?p=1072#comment-37370</guid>
		<description>Good question; I don&#039;t know if a path through a link resolver would trigger the same thing on EBSCO&#039;s end.  It might because I think it is the page that has the link resolver URL on it that is still transmitted in the &#039;referrer&#039; header.  It wouldn&#039;t get replaced with the link resolver URL.  So a direct link and a link resolver link would still have the same &#039;referrer&#039; header.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question; I don&#8217;t know if a path through a link resolver would trigger the same thing on EBSCO&#8217;s end.  It might because I think it is the page that has the link resolver URL on it that is still transmitted in the &#8216;referrer&#8217; header.  It wouldn&#8217;t get replaced with the link resolver URL.  So a direct link and a link resolver link would still have the same &#8216;referrer&#8217; header.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
