<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	> <channel><title>Comments on: Integration announced for DPubS (e-journal publishing system) and FEDORA (digital object repository)</title> <atom:link href="http://dltj.org/article/dpubs-fedora-integration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://dltj.org/article/dpubs-fedora-integration/</link> <description>We&#039;re Disrupted, We&#039;re Librarians, and We&#039;re Not Going to Take It Anymore</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 19:03:41 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Dorothea</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/dpubs-fedora-integration/comment-page-1/#comment-2744</link> <dc:creator>Dorothea</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 12:48:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2006/08/dpubs-fedora-integration/#comment-2744</guid> <description>Yes, DSpace is a sticky wicket. I&#039;m hoping that the interoperability work (e.g. the ACLS report) will kick some of the problems to the front burner. Me, I *really want* something to do what DPubS is promising, which is why I&#039;m so annoyed at the delay.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, DSpace is a sticky wicket. I&#8217;m hoping that the interoperability work (e.g. the ACLS report) will kick some of the problems to the front burner. Me, I *really want* something to do what DPubS is promising, which is why I&#8217;m so annoyed at the delay.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: the jester</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/dpubs-fedora-integration/comment-page-1/#comment-2738</link> <dc:creator>the jester</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 01:59:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2006/08/dpubs-fedora-integration/#comment-2738</guid> <description>[quote comment=&quot;2737&quot;]Which is lovely, but DPubS is still vaporware, and so I&#039;m not even going to believe their DSpace integration claims (which they&#039;ve been making for ages) until I see some non-vapor code.[/quote] Fair enough -- it always does have to come back to &quot;show me the code&quot; -- no, &quot;SHOW ME THE CODE!&quot; -- right?  Still, it is possible to envision a FEDORA integration before a dSpace integration given the nature of those two systems.  Or perhaps that is just my FEDORA-bias showing through.In any case, we could know in a few months if the open source released version comes to pass...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[quote comment="2737"]Which is lovely, but DPubS is still vaporware, and so I&#8217;m not even going to believe their DSpace integration claims (which they&#8217;ve been making for ages) until I see some non-vapor code.[/quote]<br /> Fair enough &#8212; it always does have to come back to &#8220;show me the code&#8221; &#8212; no, &#8220;SHOW ME THE CODE!&#8221; &#8212; right?  Still, it is possible to envision a FEDORA integration before a dSpace integration given the nature of those two systems.  Or perhaps that is just my FEDORA-bias showing through.</p><p>In any case, we could know in a few months if the open source released version comes to pass&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dorothea</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/dpubs-fedora-integration/comment-page-1/#comment-2737</link> <dc:creator>Dorothea</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 22:07:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2006/08/dpubs-fedora-integration/#comment-2737</guid> <description>Which is lovely, but DPubS is still vaporware, and so I&#039;m not even going to believe their DSpace integration claims (which they&#039;ve been making for ages) until I see some non-vapor code.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which is lovely, but DPubS is still vaporware, and so I&#8217;m not even going to believe their DSpace integration claims (which they&#8217;ve been making for ages) until I see some non-vapor code.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: dltj.org @ 2012-05-23 02:49:04 by W3 Total Cache -->
