<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	> <channel><title>Comments on: Looking For a Comprehensive Discovery Layer</title> <atom:link href="http://dltj.org/article/discovery-layer-itn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://dltj.org/article/discovery-layer-itn/</link> <description>We&#039;re Disrupted, We&#039;re Librarians, and We&#039;re Not Going to Take It Anymore</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 19:03:41 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: local indexing coming? &#171; Bibliographic Wilderness</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/discovery-layer-itn/comment-page-1/#comment-75276</link> <dc:creator>local indexing coming? &#171; Bibliographic Wilderness</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 12:21:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/?p=549#comment-75276</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] is lots of activity here. OhioLINK has a project going on along these lines, the Rochester XC project seeks to integrate many forms of metadata, and others. Preliminary words [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cdn.dltj.org/wp-content/plugins/kramer/kramer.gif" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" />[...] is lots of activity here. OhioLINK has a project going on along these lines, the Rochester XC project seeks to integrate many forms of metadata, and others. Preliminary words [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Brian C. Gray</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/discovery-layer-itn/comment-page-1/#comment-160382</link> <dc:creator>Brian C. Gray</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 20:53:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/?p=549#comment-160382</guid> <description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;OhioLINK  http://bit.ly/7zrurf RT @mfrisque: which consortiums are building ediscovery tools?#alamwttt #alamw10&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">OhioLINK <a href="http://bit.ly/7zrurf" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/7zrurf</a> RT @mfrisque: which consortiums are building ediscovery tools?#alamwttt #alamw10</span></span></span></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: New Directions for Discovering Information &#124; Disruptive Library Technology Jester</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/discovery-layer-itn/comment-page-1/#comment-35088</link> <dc:creator>New Directions for Discovering Information &#124; Disruptive Library Technology Jester</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 20:31:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/?p=549#comment-35088</guid> <description>[...] slide playback.Slides from OHECC presentationFor a description of the OhioLINK project, see this earlier DLTJ posting with a description from the solicitation and this follow-up posting with answers to questions from potential bidders. (When reading these [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] slide playback.Slides from OHECC presentationFor a description of the OhioLINK project, see this earlier DLTJ posting with a description from the solicitation and this follow-up posting with answers to questions from potential bidders. (When reading these [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Further Consideration of OCLC Records Use Policy &#124; Disruptive Library Technology Jester</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/discovery-layer-itn/comment-page-1/#comment-34599</link> <dc:creator>Further Consideration of OCLC Records Use Policy &#124; Disruptive Library Technology Jester</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 02:13:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/?p=549#comment-34599</guid> <description>[...] University of Rochester and the newly announced Serials Solutions Summon product. OhioLINK recently solicited responses from vendors where this kind of capability is a key product of a new discovery layer. Other projects (such as [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] University of Rochester and the newly announced Serials Solutions Summon product. OhioLINK recently solicited responses from vendors where this kind of capability is a key product of a new discovery layer. Other projects (such as [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Amalgam: Barriers</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/discovery-layer-itn/comment-page-1/#comment-34359</link> <dc:creator>Amalgam: Barriers</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 14:47:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/?p=549#comment-34359</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] in a coherent single list. Well, that is the plan at least according to the people over at Disrputive Library Technology Jester. That would be pretty awesome.      Posted by Rogue Librarian   at 10:51 [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cdn.dltj.org/wp-content/plugins/kramer/kramer.gif" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" />[...] in a coherent single list. Well, that is the plan at least according to the people over at Disrputive Library Technology Jester. That would be pretty awesome.      Posted by Rogue Librarian   at 10:51 [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: the Jester</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/discovery-layer-itn/comment-page-1/#comment-34034</link> <dc:creator>the Jester</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 22:14:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/?p=549#comment-34034</guid> <description>Jonathan -- feel free to e-mail me the names of the vendors directly, and I&#039;ll make sure they are on our list to receive the ITN document.  I think I&#039;ve been comprehensive in identifying the right vendors, but you never know...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan &#8212; feel free to e-mail me the names of the vendors directly, and I&#8217;ll make sure they are on our list to receive the ITN document.  I think I&#8217;ve been comprehensive in identifying the right vendors, but you never know&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jonathan Rochkind</title><link>http://dltj.org/article/discovery-layer-itn/comment-page-1/#comment-34033</link> <dc:creator>Jonathan Rochkind</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 22:00:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/?p=549#comment-34033</guid> <description>Interesting! They&#039;re asking for the right thing.I only know of one vendor with a product anywhere close to what they ask for--even for just one component of the product, really. Maybe a couple more who have one component.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting! They&#8217;re asking for the right thing.</p><p>I only know of one vendor with a product anywhere close to what they ask for&#8211;even for just one component of the product, really. Maybe a couple more who have one component.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: dltj.org @ 2012-05-23 02:17:36 by W3 Total Cache -->
