<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries to build a consortial repository using FEDORA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dltj.org/article/coalliance-adr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dltj.org/article/coalliance-adr/</link>
	<description>We&#039;re Disrupted, We&#039;re Librarians, and We&#039;re Not Going to Take It Anymore</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:47:21 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: the Jester</title>
		<link>http://dltj.org/article/coalliance-adr/comment-page-1/#comment-36575</link>
		<dc:creator>the Jester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2006/10/coalliance-adr/#comment-36575</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your comment, &quot;denver criminal lawyer&quot;, although I think that open source software is also good for the &#039;uneducated masses&#039; as well.  Also, please pardon me if I offend you by removing the URL to your personal injury practice site (which was w w w . f l e s c h l a w . c o m -- in case anyone else was interested).  While I applaud your support of open source software -- which I believe to be sincere because you are, after all, an honest lawyer and wouldn&#039;t resort to link-bating tactics for a little extra Google juice -- I prefer to keep a respectable distance between &lt;acronym title=&quot;Disruptive Library Technology Jester&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;DLTJ&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/acronym&gt; and the legal profession.  I&#039;m sure you understand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your comment, &#8220;denver criminal lawyer&#8221;, although I think that open source software is also good for the &#8216;uneducated masses&#8217; as well.  Also, please pardon me if I offend you by removing the URL to your personal injury practice site (which was w w w . f l e s c h l a w . c o m &#8212; in case anyone else was interested).  While I applaud your support of open source software &#8212; which I believe to be sincere because you are, after all, an honest lawyer and wouldn&#8217;t resort to link-bating tactics for a little extra Google juice &#8212; I prefer to keep a respectable distance between <acronym title="Disruptive Library Technology Jester"><i>DLTJ</i></acronym> and the legal profession.  I&#8217;m sure you understand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: denver criminal lawyer</title>
		<link>http://dltj.org/article/coalliance-adr/comment-page-1/#comment-36571</link>
		<dc:creator>denver criminal lawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 02:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2006/10/coalliance-adr/#comment-36571</guid>
		<description>Projects like Alliance Digital Repository (ADR) encourage the use of open source software which ensures that the best quality software is easily accessible to the majority of the educated masses. I strongly believe that application of knowledge should be done more to help the larger community and less for profits. The ADR project is a major step in achieving that milestone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Projects like Alliance Digital Repository (ADR) encourage the use of open source software which ensures that the best quality software is easily accessible to the majority of the educated masses. I strongly believe that application of knowledge should be done more to help the larger community and less for profits. The ADR project is a major step in achieving that milestone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pintiniblog</title>
		<link>http://dltj.org/article/coalliance-adr/comment-page-1/#comment-6118</link>
		<dc:creator>pintiniblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/2006/10/coalliance-adr/#comment-6118</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;adoptent la tenue &quot;consortium&quot; (ladite Académie étant composée de 4 institutions différentes). C&#039;est aussi le cas de la Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries, qui a choisi elle aussi Fedora...    Source: Open Access News    Màj (27 oct.): cf. aussi   18:20 Publié dans Dépôts institutionnels &#124; Lien permanent &#124; Commentaires (0) &#124; Trackbacks (0) &#124; Envoyer cette note &#124; Tags : depots institutionnels, institutional repositories, oa, pintini, pinitiniblog&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="technorati-balloon" href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?url=http://dltj.org/article/coalliance-adr/"><img src="http://static.technorati.com/images/bubble_h17.gif" class="technorati-balloon" alt="links from Technorati" style="border:0;" /></a>adoptent la tenue &#8220;consortium&#8221; (ladite Académie étant composée de 4 institutions différentes). C&#8217;est aussi le cas de la Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries, qui a choisi elle aussi Fedora&#8230;    Source: Open Access News    Màj (27 oct.): cf. aussi   18:20 Publié dans Dépôts institutionnels | Lien permanent | Commentaires (0) | Trackbacks (0) | Envoyer cette note | Tags : depots institutionnels, institutional repositories, oa, pintini, pinitiniblog</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
