<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clarification Offered for &#8220;Technology: The textbook of the future&#8221; in Nature</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dltj.org/article/clarification-offered-for-technology-the-textbook-of-the-future-in-nature/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dltj.org/article/clarification-offered-for-technology-the-textbook-of-the-future-in-nature/</link>
	<description>We&#039;re Disrupted, We&#039;re Librarians, and We&#039;re Not Going to Take It Anymore</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 04:21:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: the Jester</title>
		<link>http://dltj.org/article/clarification-offered-for-technology-the-textbook-of-the-future-in-nature/comment-page-1/#comment-35168</link>
		<dc:creator>the Jester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 15:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/?p=855#comment-35168</guid>
		<description>I linked to the article the best way I could.  I did receive a courtesy copy from the author (e.g., I didn&#039;t pay to read the article on the Nature website), and I recognize that I don&#039;t have the right to redistribute the copy I received.

If I believe anything, as it relates to the topic of information distribution, it is that there are new business models to be explored that make some forms of distribution &quot;free&quot; while being supported by the monetization of other forms of distribution.  I don&#039;t think I&#039;m being inconsistent here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I linked to the article the best way I could.  I did receive a courtesy copy from the author (e.g., I didn&#8217;t pay to read the article on the Nature website), and I recognize that I don&#8217;t have the right to redistribute the copy I received.</p>
<p>If I believe anything, as it relates to the topic of information distribution, it is that there are new business models to be explored that make some forms of distribution &#8220;free&#8221; while being supported by the monetization of other forms of distribution.  I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;m being inconsistent here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://dltj.org/article/clarification-offered-for-technology-the-textbook-of-the-future-in-nature/comment-page-1/#comment-35167</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 15:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dltj.org/?p=855#comment-35167</guid>
		<description>Funny that you would link to an article that requires a micropayment to read, given your seemingly unbounded belief that information wants to be free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny that you would link to an article that requires a micropayment to read, given your seemingly unbounded belief that information wants to be free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
