Skip to content
Solely for the Purpose of Catching $PAMRZ

Buzzwords Galore and Bandwidth that May Rival Your Stationwagon

At the recent LITA Top Technology Trends gathering, Clifford Lynch spoke of an advanced network emerging from Internet2 that is built as a hybrid between optical-switched and packet-switched networks. Today’s Internet2 Newsletter has a description of the activities, excerpted below

Internet2 and Level 3 to Deploy Next Generation Nationwide Research Network

The new Internet2 Network, a dynamic, innovative and cost-effective hybrid optical and packet network, will provide next-generation production services as well as a platform for the development of new networking ideas and techniques.
http://networks.internet2.edu

Internet2 has entered into a partnership with Level 3 Communications, a leading national telecommunications carrier, to provide the U.S. research and education community with a dynamic, innovative and cost-effective hybrid optical and packet network. An extension of the Internet2 cutting-edge tradition, the new network is designed to provide next-generation production services as well as a platform for the development of new networking ideas and techniques. Internet2 is committed to ensuring community involvement in the development, implementation, and operations of the new network.

The new Internet2 Network will be deployed nationally over 13,000 miles of dedicated fiber, providing complete community control of the optical layer and highly granular lightpath services that can be provisioned dynamically. It will provide short-term and long-term waves, as well as on-demand or advanced reservation “lightpath” scheduling. The IP network, corresponding to the current Abilene footprint, will be built on the optical network. A basic connectivity package for direct connectors is expected to include two 10 Gbps waves, one for IP and one for point-to-point optical services.

Optical (Layer 1) network characteristics:

  • Initial deployment - 10 x 10 Gbps wavelengths along network footprint
  • Maximum capacity - 80 x 10 Gbps wavelengths
  • Scalability - potential migration to 40 Gbps and 100 Gbps capabilities
  • Flexibility - support for sub-wavelength (e.g., 1 GigE) dynamic provisioning across every wave on the network backbone.

The Level 3 carrier agreement provides reliability and unprecedented community control over the networking infrastructure, without taking on the risks of equipment sparing and obsolescence as well as the burden of substantial operational responsibilities. Level 3 will be responsible for meeting a Service Level Agreement (SLA). The buildout of the network will happen over several months, with a target completion in the fall of 2007. The transition to the new network will not disrupt existing connectivity and services.

The Internet2 Networks page has a description that is a little bit more approachable:

Internet2 and Level 3 Communications, Inc. will develop and deploy a new nationwide network and new services to enhance and support the advanced needs of the academic and research community. This new network initially will offer Internet2 members 100 gigabits per second (Gbps) of capacity, more than 10 times that of the current Internet2 backbone network, and will be designed to easily scale to add capacity as Internet2 members’ requirements evolve over time. Based on input and feedback from the research and education community, including experience gained with the Hybrid Optical and Packet Infrastructure (HOPI) project, the network will be designed to support a full range of production IP services as well as new on-demand, dedicated optical wavelength services to support the most demanding network applications and experimentation.

Okay, maybe that description isn’t all that more approachable either. The thing is this: the research and development community are pushing the raw networking capabilities farther and farther. “Optical wavelength services” may not mean much to you — perhaps about as much as the intricate chemical dance that turns petroleum into gasoline, plastics, chapstick and bubble gum 1 — but the comparison is not too much of a stretch. They’ve figured out how to send multiple frequencies of light down the same piece of fibre-optic cable, effectively multiplying its capacity. The neat thing about the Internet2 work is that, should you need it, it sounds like you’ll be able to sign up for a point-to-point lightwave frequency to do with what you need. (You’ll probably need a pretty good reason, of course.)

Oh, and the stationwagon comment? When you think you have a really zippy network connection, someone will (should?) bring up an old internet adage which says “Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes.” (This, of course, shouldn’t be confused with the term “sneakernet” — the bandwidth speed and capacity at which you could walk your flash drive over to your colleague rather than trying to e-mail, FTP, torrent, webify, or send via carrier pigeon that document that the two of you have been working on.)

Footnotes

  1. Butyl Rubber is in Bubble Gum and you need petroleum to make butyl rubber. gack []

7 Comments

  1. walt crawford | July 18, 2006 at 4:28 pm | Permalink

    How about a 747 full of BluRay discs?

    (I’ve used “a cargo jet full of CD-ROMs,” but hey, at 50GB each and given their size and weight, identical to CDs, BluRays are even better…)

  2. the jester | July 18, 2006 at 8:31 pm | Permalink
    Cargo capacity of your average Boeing 747-400, in cargo configuration, in cubic meters Source 159
    Volume of a carton of 200 slim jewel cases (53cm by 26cm by 15.5cm), in cubic meters Source 0.021359
    Number of cartons of slim jewel cases per Boeing 747-400 7,444
    Number of slim jewel cases, each with one Blu-ray DVD, per Boeing 747-400 1,488,800
    Data capacity of one Blu-ray DVD, dual layer, in Gigabytes Source 50
    Same, in Gigabits (8 bits per byte) 400
    Data capacity of one Boeing 747-400, in the cargo configuration, filled with dual-layer Blu-ray DVDs in slim jewel cases, in Gigabits 595,520,000
    Distance between New York’s JFK airport and Los Angeles’ LAX airport, in statue miles Source 2,470
    Maximum cruising speed of a Boeing 747-400, in knots Source 507
    Flight time between New York’s JFK airport and Los Angeles’ LAX airport at 507 knots, in seconds Source 16,080
    Bandwidth of a Boeing 747-400 cargo airplane filled to capacity with Blu-ray discs in slim jewel cases traveling at maximum rated cruising speed between John F Kennedy Intl airport and Los Angeles Intl airport 37,034.826 Gb/s

    This of course assumes a negligible time to load and unload said Boeing 747-400, no airport congestion, a frictionless plane and a perfect spherical earth, along with several other typical assumptions from the world of physics.

    Hmmm — 37Tb/s network. I guess we need to lay some more fibre optic cable…

  3. walt crawford | July 18, 2006 at 10:57 pm | Permalink

    Wow. Librarians really do know how to find stuff. I’m thoroughly impressed.

    But…Office Depot (for one) now sells slim jewel cases that hold TWO CDs or DVDs or Blu-ray discs each (that is, four in the equivalent space of one regular jewel box.

    So that makes it 74Tb/s. Not bad for physical shipment.

    I could get fancy and suggest that using Tyvek sleeves might allow you to cram in even more, which is true enough (I get around 3.5 sleeved discs in the space of a single slim jewel box), and that puts the bandwidth at something better than 100Tb/s. But that also leaves the discs pretty well unprotected…

  4. the jester | July 19, 2006 at 8:01 am | Permalink

    Thanks, Walt, although it might be best to substitute “I’m thoroughly impressed” with “You’re thoroughly obsessed.”

    I didn’t know about the Office Depot® CD Double Slim Jewel Cases — that would effectively double the bandwidth. I did make a choice not to use the Tyvek sleeves (as if this choice really meant something!) because of all of the bouncing around a Boeing 747 would encounter on take-off and landing — we do have our commitment to media preservation to uphold, after all. Besides, that would decrease our bandwidth because of the increased need for checksum discs and other error-correction schemes should some quantity of disks fail in flight. (Retransmission of the entire 747-sized packet is a lot of overhead.)

    I am starting to get concerned, however, about exceeding the lift capacity of the air frame. That, however, is left as an exercise for the (next) reader…

  5. Dorothea | July 19, 2006 at 11:22 am | Permalink

    The latency’s a bear, though…

  6. john wilson | January 5, 2007 at 1:22 am | Permalink

    How much bandwidth does a T1 Line eat up? That is an amazing story. Makes you think. Bandwidth in the eye of the Internet beholder!

  7. the jester | June 8, 2007 at 3:55 pm | Permalink

    And much does the Internet weigh? Not that this is really related to the original topic, but the Guardian newspaper ran a story yesterday with the answera>:

    About two ounces (60 grams), or perhaps 0.2 millionths of an ounce (6 micrograms), depending which method you use to calculate the weight of the active electrons necessary to sustain the global network.

    ckquote>

2 Trackbacks

  1. Walt at Random | August 1, 2006 at 9:49 pm | Permalink

    links from Technorati Go read this post at Peter Murray’s Disruptive Library Technology Jester. And then go read the comments. Specifically the second one, where Peter Murray responds to my offhand suggestion that the bandwidth of a station wagon full of computer tapes pales compared to

  2. Kramer auto Pingback[...] Bandwidth of a 747 full of blu-ray DVDs. Posted at 12:16am Permalink ∞ Page 1 of 1 [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *
Human Detection Scheme
(What's this?)
Comment Preview

Subscribe without commenting

From the Disruptive Library Technology Jester (http://dltj.org/), printed on Friday the 25th of July 2008 at 8:24:46 AM EDT (-0400). The URL to this page is http://dltj.org/article/internet2-hopi-network/

[Creative Commons Logo] This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 543 Howard Street, 5th Floor, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA.